Translate

Thursday, 29 September 2016

Claire Khaw on Nationalism And Conservatism at the Swinton Circle

Tuesday, 27 September 2016

Nobel Lecture by Harold Pinter





https://sputniknews.com/columnists/20160927/1045744139/us-empire-unmasked.html

Friday, 23 September 2016

The true status of men in the West



Feminism causes immigration and turns women into sluts. 

How long are British men going to put up with this disgusting treachery from their immoral women? Have they no sense of shame? Don't they even care what other nations think of them?

If I am taken away by the agents of the Big Sister State for my heresy against their sacred religion of feminism and their sacrament of sluttery, I expect British men to defend me, because no one else has gone out his way to say what I have said and done what I have done to warn them of their folly of worshiping sluts. I am not even a white or male, but just want to live in a country where the men are not afraid of immoral women whose morals are lower than that of even a common prostitute. Is that really too much to ask?

Tuesday, 20 September 2016

Paul Gascoigne should have fought for the right of Englishmen to tell racist jokes all the way up to the Supreme Court

http://www.expressandstar.com/news/crime/2016/09/19/paul-gascoigne-pleads-guilty-over-racist-joke-at-wolverhamptons-civic-hall/

While it is clearly racist and false to suggest that a black man's teeth would glow in the dark while a white man's wouldn't, which Act of Parliament forbade the telling of racist jokes? Is a freeborn Englishman still entitled to assume that what is not forbidden is allowed, or must he check with a woman every time he decides to say or do anything? So when exactly did the rules change?
 
Gazza was being prosecuted under s 5 of the Public Order Act 1986.  The purpose of that Act 1986 is to preserve public order. Telling a racist joke in Wolverhampton Civic Hall in no way threatened public order. Therefore the prosecution of Gazza by the CPS headed by feminazi Directrix of Public Prosecutions Alison Saunders was obviously politically motivated.

It is politically motivated because it was not in the public interest to worsen race relations. How is it in the public interest to make the white man feel that the black man has the whip hand over him in his own country, as Enoch Powell warned would happen if immigration was not controlled?

Can you imagine the PC CPS seriously considering a white man's complaint about a black man telling a joke about white men and humiliating him in public? Of course not. The femimazi DPP would send him away with a flea in his ear.

Why Females Prefer Immigrant Males

http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21688397-absorb-newcomers-peacefully-europe-must-insist-they-respect-values-such-tolerance-and Did a woman write this? I think we should be told.

What does this politically-motivated prosecution reveal about the position of the white man in his own land? That he is lower in status than the black man and certainly lower in status than his women, who despise him.

Feminazis are after all white middle class women who fear and loathe white working class men angry enough to vote BNP or at least UKIP.

Feminazis pose a far greater threat to white working men than Muslims, but white plebs are too Islamophobic to see this or to see that only Islam will be strong enough to eradicate feminism. After feminism is eradicated, men will finally be able to wrest back control of a government that now prioritises the preferences of immoral parasitical women at their expense.

If we don't watch out, feminazis in charge of Government Departments will soon be declaring that using the word "feminazi" is misogyny, and misogyny is THOUGHTCRIME punishable by fines, loss of liberty, manual amputation, castration and perhaps even the death penalty.

The American working man has Donald Trump to represent him, but British male MPs are too stupid, skint and scared to challenge the matriarchy. Philip Davies MP is only one man anyway, and very from being a billionaire. He also voted for Andrea Leadsom rather than Michael Gove to be Tory leader which suggests that his judgement is not infallible. It is to be doubted he will do much for men all by himself while other male Tory MPs cower and quake at the thought of Theresa May frowning at them.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-mp-philip-davies-says-militant-feminists-dont-really-believe-in-equality-unless-it-suits-them-a7191946.html



Philip Davies MP - the only male MP in the UK not too afraid to challenge the matriarchy

Monday, 19 September 2016

The British Thought Police widens its definition of thoughtcrime


Mere vulgar abuse is an insult that is not necessarily defamatory because it is not intended to be taken literally or believed, or likely to cause real damage to a reputation. Vituperative statements made in anger, such as calling someone "an arse" during a drunken argument, would likely be considered mere vulgar abuse and not defamatory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

What is not even a civil wrong has now become a crime in matriarchal Britain.

In the days of the patriarchy, there was free speech, but no longer in our demented matriarchy.

The Bhagavad Gita:

"Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."

"Out of the corruption of SLUTS proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."

"Out of the corruption of TOLERATING SLUTS AND BASTARDS proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil."

The price of sex

The price of sex is crucial to the how feminism strikes its bargains with men. It offers men cheap sex with women they are not married to, and also allows men to have sex with other men. Feminism is about facilitating sexual liberation and getting men so hooked on cheap plentiful sex they lose the will to fight feminism.

The patriarchy forces both men and women to mostly have the most expensive form of sex - marriage - by forbidding and punishing extramarital sex. It also criminalises gay sex but allows brothel-keeping. These measures ensure that men pay for sex up front and don't expect to get it for free.

Feminism, you will have noticed, pretends sex is free but loads it full of high hidden charges for which the man himself pays eg CSA or society eg a higher crime rate when singly-parented juvenile delinquents become adult criminals.

The patriarchal imperative is to go forth and multiply thereby creating the manpower with which to acquire and maintain empires.

Sexual liberation - which a matriarchy condones - results in a shrinking and ageing population ultimately becoming unable to even have enough manpower to fight a successful defensive war.

Feminism is not just bad for the West, it is bad for any civilisation.

Thursday, 15 September 2016

My offer of free advice to Pauline Hanson



http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-37335544

While I am neither Australian nor white, I do believe I understand exactly how white people are feeling about their national identity and immigration. Although I live in the UK, it is not hard to see how uncontrolled immigration and migrant swarms makes everyone nervous. Even my parents who are neither European nor live in Europe feel alarmed and concerned about European identity because they like to go there on holiday. 

I am really writing to offer you my services as political consultant for free until the benefit of it is proven.

That I am not white should have the effect of deflecting some of the more predictable accusations of racism made against you. 

You may be interested to know that as well as being legally trained, I was a member of the British National Party and was nearly its London Mayoral Candidate in 2011. My expulsion before this was the consequence of an unmarried single mother in the party taking against me for criticising the morals of such women.