Translate

Friday, 24 April 2009

BNP calls non-white British Citizens "racial foreigners"

On the question of BNP policy to term non-white British Citizens holding British passports "racial foreigners", a correspondent of mine asks:

Even those of us who are against immigration will take exception to people being branded 2nd class citizens. What next? Muslims wearing yellow crescents? Hindus wearing yellow swastikas?

Perhaps non-white British citizens will have their present passports confiscated and replaced with a second class passport stating "British Citizen and Racial Foreigner" passport in the BNP's first term of office.

In their second term, they will have that replaced with a third class passport stating "British Citizen enlisted for Repatriation".

In their third term of office, those that have not yet left will have that passport confiscated and be issued instead with an Expulsion Order ...

This cannot be the impression the BNP wish to give now, even if that is what they would really wish to do.

Sigh! If only my suggested solution would be more widely discussed!

http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=75

The Report by Mukul Devichand and what Hazel Blears said about education and training

Thu, 23 Apr 09
Duration:29 mins

Mukul Devichand assesses the British National Party's Chairman, Nick Griffin's bid to become the party's first MEP in the forthcoming European elections in June.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/r4report/

There are those who may be howling with delight at this latest "revelation" that the BNP deny the existence of Black and Asian Britons.

For anyone who has read their constitution and is aware of their membership policy, this should come as no surprise. The BNP do not regard non-white British citizens as part of the British nation. In this way they are undeniably and incorrigibly racist.

I have listened to the programme and in the interests of objectivity and fairness highlight the following statements made by Nick Griffin to Mukul Devichand.

Non-whites are "racial foreigners" in civic terms.

Griffin ontends that "British" is an "ethnic description", ie a racial description.

[I would contend that it is not, simply because white Contintental North European peoples are racially indistinguishable from white British people.]

He goes on to say:

"You can be part of our society and be entitled to the protection of all our laws", but we cannot have large numbers of foreigners coming here and calling themselves English or British without denying the right of the white Briton to his own identity or diluting it to such an extent that it becomes worthless. To do so would be morally wrong.

My elegant solution of using police race identification codes in the previous post is intended to make both the racial purists and the civic nationalists happy, but I anticipate objections.

I also wish to highlight what Hazel Blears, Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, said around the 17th minute of the programme. It is quoted verbatim simply because it is so ungrammatical and incoherent:


"The BNP have divisive pernicious polices that will do the working classes no good at all. What we need is a proper discussion in this country about making sure British people have a chance to get the skills and education to get the jobs of the future. If we don’t have it and pretend somehow it might be construed as racist and therefore we are not going to talk about those issues, then where is politics?"

I think she is agreeing with me that decades of failed education policies has resulted in the increase in BNP support. Sink-school comp-educated "locals"/ "white trash"/"CHAVs" - call them what you will - finding that employers in fact prefer a foreign workforce who are better-trained and have a better work ethic, will be voting BNP in droves, and will continue doing so, unless something is done about the parlous state of British "education", whose products British employers and businesses shun.

I do hope she liaises with Ed Balls, the Secretary of State to the Department With A Silly Rainbow Logo, about just this matter.

Again, I have an elegant solution for this too, which is to be found at

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/02/new-model-comprehensive-by-tories.html

BNP says Black Britons and Asian Britons do not exist

British National Party (BNP) chairman Nick Griffin has defended a party leaflet which says that black Britons and Asian Britons "do not exist".

The BNP's "Language and Concepts Discipline Manual" says the term used should be "racial foreigners".

In a BBC interview, Mr Griffin said to call such people British was a sort of "bloodless genocide" because it denied indigenous people their own identity.

The BNP manual, leaked to the anti-fascist group Searchlight and seen by the BBC, says that "BNP activists and writers should never refer to 'black Britons' or 'Asian Britons' etc, for the simple reason that such persons do not exist".

"These people are 'black residents' of the UK etc, and are no more British than an Englishman living in Hong Kong is Chinese.

"Collectively, foreign residents of other races should be referred to as 'racial foreigners', a non-pejorative term... The key in such matters is above all to maintain necessary distinctions while avoiding provocation and insult."

The manual describes the BNP's "ultimate aim" as the "lawful, humane and voluntary repatriation of the resident foreigners of
the UK".

Commenting on the leaflet's content, Mr Griffin told The Report
on Radio 4 that although "in civic terms they are British, British also has a meaning as an ethnic description".

"We don't subscribe to the politically correct fiction that just because they happen to be born in Britain, a Pakistani is a Briton. They're not; they remain of Pakistani stock.

"You can't say that especially large numbers of people can come from the rest of the world and assume an English identity without denying the English their own identity, and I would say that's wrong," he added.

"In a very subtle way, it's a sort of bloodless genocide."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8011878.stm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/r4report/


Those who wish to join the debate on just this subject should visit:

http://www.1party4all.co.uk/Home/Account/TopicForm.aspx?topicsId=130

I have said elsewhere that the BNP have persistently confused race with nation, simply because they like to think there is no difference, forgetting that white Britons are really just former invaders who have forgotten that their ancestors too were formerly invaders, descended from the Vikings, Angles, Normands and other white groups who arrived here as refugees such as the Huguenots.

(The raping and pillaging Vikings must have been regarded with horror greater than modern Britons regard Muslims. Yet, everywhere, now you see the word "Viking" being used as a brand for office suppliers - http://www.viking-direct.co.uk/, dry cleaners etc.

The descendants of Ancient Britons are now holed up in Wales and Cornwall, hating the English and wanting to turf them out too. Cornish nationalism is real. Hatred of country folk of townies buying up rural houses is real.)

Perhaps a more historic view should be taken.

The BNP are clearly not aware that it is a historical inevitability that the invaders will in turn and in time be invaded themselves if their foreign, domestic, economic and social policies result in the weakening of the nation, whoever this concept includes.

Any dictionary would confirm that "race" is not the same as "nation".

One is a description of physical characteristics, the other an abstract concept.

Of course you cannot become Chinese no matter how long you live in China or Hongkong, because you cannot change your racial characteristics, unless you are Michael Jackson.

However, you can be a Chinese national without even going there if you are given a Chinese passport. When that happens, then any blonde-haired, blue-eyed white man holding such a passport would have to be accepted as such by all the Immigration Officers in the world.

I have suggested elsewhere that white Britons could call themselves IC1 English, IC1 Scots or IC1 Welsh, for example. The Police use race identification codes to identify supects, ie

IC1 for someone of Caucasian appearance, eg white-skinned European types - English, Scottish, Welsh, Scandinavian and Russian

IC2 for Mediterranean, eg dark-skinned European types - Sardinian, Spanish, Italian

IC3 for Afro-Caribbean, eg Negroid types - Caribbean, West Indian, African, Nigerian

IC4 for Asian, eg Indians and Pakistanis

IC5 for Oriental, eg Chinese, Japanese, Mongolians, Siamese

IC6 for Arabians, Egyptians, Algerians, Moroccans and North Africans

Then the white British race would have their own special group identity (which no one can hijack) and be happier bunnies.

Thursday, 23 April 2009

St George's Day Greetings

I have received a rather lovely St George's Day card and pass on its excellent greetings to anyone reading this:


This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
This fortress built by Nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall,
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm,


this England.


Shakespeare (Richard II)

May the goodness of St George,
the Patron Saint of England,
inspire and bless you and yours
on this our nation's
Festival Day.

Charming as this all is, I would like to suggest an alternative day that I would like to be called Britannia Day.

St Andrew's Day - 30 November
St David's Day - 1 March
St George's Day - 23 April

30 + 1 + 23 = 54 divided by 3 = 18

11 + 3 + 4 = 18 divided by 3 = 6, ie the sixth month

By this formula I have arrived at a British National Day, with an auspicious and pleasing number on a day likely to be warm and sunny.

18 June also commemorates the Battle of Waterloo, which is an excellent coincidence.

Those interested in military history may wish to visit

http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/empire_seapower/launch_gms_battle_waterloo.shtml

This National Day would be celebrated by two main television events, as well as feasting and drinking in moderation.

TV Idea No 1

The appeal of a beauty contest called Britannia the Beautiful open to all races of aspiring Britannias who will wear little else but the Union Jack would be great, I think.

Voting would be by SMS.

TV Idea No 2

An alternative Britannia in a Burqa could be just the thing to display the personalities of single British women of all races and religions not considered to be conventionally attractive. Single men would make offers of marriage only after their questions have been answered to their satisfaction. These women would of course also have a list of questions for the men about their prospects, property and ambitions.

It would be a bit like Blind Date but with the contestants in burqas. This would be when deportment, wit, learning and personality would come into its own ....

Only when an offer has been made and accepted would the burqa be removed to reveal the features and the form of the woman concerned.

I am quite happy to host this show if asked, in case any TV people looking for new ideas for game shows and TV competitions are interested.

If they do not think me suitable perhaps Terry Wogan or Michael Parkinson could do it.

Tuesday, 21 April 2009

Alas! Unwise Tom Wise!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6136068.ece

I hope these prospective BNP MEP candidates will take note.

As I have said many a time before, Sinn Feinn's abstentionist policy was far more principled and effective.

Becoming MEP means putting yourself in the pocket of that which you claim is your oppressor.

It is well-known that expenses claims will show virtually all of us up if anyone wants to make trouble for us.

Want to get rid of someone? Go through his expenses claims.

I have been to Tom Wise's talks and see absolutely no point at all his preaching to the converted. The only people who would turn up to anti-EU talks are those who have already decided that we want out. I frankly thought it was a waste of time his telling us how bureaucratic, wasteful and silly it all was, and rather resented have to pay to listen to him state the obvious.

Let prospective BNP MEPs be warned. It is a poisoned chalice, and everyone will be going through your expenses with a fine-tooth comb.

Then you will start hearing of BNP MEPs "going native" and you will hear them speaking of Euro-nationalism instead of British nationalism.

You mark my words.

Mr Wise and Ms Jenkins will appear at City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court on April 27.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5T7GXrDCJMI
Tom Wise boasting about his cushy life as an MEP to impress a "posh Teddington bird".

Monday, 20 April 2009

Louis Theroux - A Place for Paedophiles

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00k3ms6

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/the-weekends-television-louis-theroux-ndash-a-place-for-paedophiles-sun-bbc2-1671224.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=IEt3-kuVl5Y

A very frustrating programme to watch, since Theroux did not ask the question I would have asked, viz

1. Why are paedophiles paedophiles?

2. Why do they prefer children?

3. What is so erotic about children?

4. Why would you risk so much shame and punishment, when you could presumably satisfy yourself with more available sex objects, viz women or gay men or prostitutes of both sexes?

5. Is it because they are too unattractive to find sex partners?

6. Is it because they are too poor to be able to pay for prostitutes?

7. Why are most paedophiles male?

8. Why is such an apparently all-male institution run by female clinicians?

9. Why were so many of them apparently nice and normal-seeming and so educated and articulate?

10. Surely it is all right to want to have sex with children, provided they do not have sex with children? (If thoughts were deeds, what villains we'd all be! After all, we all occasionally want to commit murder, adultery, theft, etc, don't we?)

11. Are there more paedophiles now than there were before, in a previous age? Or was it always ever thus?

12. If their numbers have increased, what is the reason?

13. Is paedophilia a male reaction to feminism?

14.  If paedophiles are mosquitoes, are single mothers stagnant pools of water?

It is enough, surely, to be satisfied that these paedophiles do not wish to remain paedophiles. There is no need to in effect make them lie about their state of mind, ie that they no longer wish to have sex with children, in order to get out. The only requirement ought to be for them to explain why they prefer children when women are so easily available, and why they prefer dangerously deviant sex to easily obtainable legal sex.

Could it be because men do not want to have their feelings hurt by a sexually experienced female saying things like "Is that all?" or telling her friends afterwards that he is not as well-endowed as she would have wished? Or that her previous lovers were all much better?

Men are really as insecure as women but are not allowed to admit it. They therefore suffer more from their insecurities because they cannot really let it out, for the more astute of them know that the moment they express emotions and show any weakness as they have been invited to do by their women, their women will lose all respect for them.

It seems the conversation I had with a mother many years ago was much more revealing. I asked her why she thought paedophiles preferred children. Her answer was simple: "Power."

Yes, the power you have when you get there before anyone else.

Perhaps someone else would like to attempt answers to the questions unasked by Louis Theroux.

Andrew Slade's comment on discrimination

Below is the excellent point Andrew made, elegantly demonstrating why discriminating against those who would discriminate is, logically, nonsensical and insupportable.

All political beliefs "discriminate on the basis of ... other beliefs", by
definition. Otherwise, how can you believe in anything, unless you
discriminate against the beliefs you choose not to believe in?

How can you choose a bottle of French wine, without discriminating against Italian, Chilean, Argentine and New Zealand wines? You can't drink them all!

English liberal fanatical relativists seem to think you can believe in everything simultaneously! (in the name of "toleration").

Wednesday, 15 April 2009

Teacher mental health, disruptive pupils, a junior version of the stocks and pillory

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article6085758.ece http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_7999000/7999458.stm

Apparently, the exclusion of disruptive pupils is being tentatively considered, but why not just bring back corporal punishment?

A school version of the stocks and pillory could be tested out on delinquent children, before an adult version is brought in.

It would be a business opportunity for schools to sell appropriate missiles not injurious to the health and safety of the delinquents to be thus punished. School punishment balls could be manufactured, made of heavy rubber, and the whole school could take part.

Those who refuse this punishment will be deemed to have excluded themselves.

Sorted!

Tim Winter for Mufti!

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article1909809.ece

reports that British Muslims do not have a mufti and should have one. This was from a report in 2007, and it really is quite remiss of the Muslims not to have sorted that one out yet.

My preferred candidate is Tim Winter, whose voice I find guilt-inducingly thrilling.

The first time I heard his voice on Thought of the Day, I was lying in bed, but he woke me up good and proper, with his deep mellifluous tones speaking his exciting Islamic thoughts.

It looks as if it is now time to start a Tim Winter for Mufti campaign, when I already have so much on my plate, such as my flagging campaign to become Jury Team London MEP candidate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mufti

To hear Tim Winter's thrilling voice and inspirationally Islamic thoughts, visit

http://www.platitudes.org.uk/platblog/index.php

and search for him under Shaikh Abdal Hakim Murad. There is the proper version and the satirical version, both of which are excellently wise and excellently funny.

A campaigning chant comes to mind:

Tim Winter for Mufti! Tim Winter for Mufti!

We need your views on Direct Democracy!

Sunday, 12 April 2009

Find me a Fatwa!

Those of you who know me will know that I have a bee in my bonnet about Direct Democracy.

I am now Jury Team MEP candidate at

http://www.juryteam.org/candidate-profile.php?id=10109

and receiving, I regret to report, not much support at all.

Perhaps I should take myself off to the nearest Easter Fair and sell kisses, or something, in exchange for a vote, costing no more than 25p and standard network charges for an SMS from your phone.

I then wondered whether Islamic scholars have a view on direct democracy and found this Find Me A Fatwa site at http://fatwaislam.com/

It calls itself "The Most Comprehensive Online Islamic Fatwa Guide" yet had nothing whatsoever on direct democracy.

I would like a fatwa from the Islamic scholar Tim Winter AKA Abdal Hakim Murad and wonder where I can go to order one.

Can one ask for one directly, or must one have an intermediary, analogous to going to a solicitor, who will in turn obtain Counsel's Opinion?

Does one have to be a Muslim to order one and will a fatwa fee be payable?

It appears not and is free, from

http://www.askimam.org/index.php

It is truly an excellent idea. Instead of agony aunts, the Muslims have agony uncles who are learned in the Koran. I have asked my question and can't wait to receive my answer, which should arrive in 3 days' time!

There is even a Fatwa Line at

0845 108 7799

which dispenses fatwas on Mondays to Thursdays between 12-1pm.

Tessa Culnane speech at a Lewisham & Bromley BNP meeting

http://tv.bnp.org.uk/2009/04/tess-culnane-speaking-at-a-bromley-lewisham-meeting/

This is a rather moving speech by Tessa Culnane whom I met at Howden & Haltemprice last year, when she was campaigning for the National Front. She has since rejoined the BNP.

Her answer, when I asked the reason for her change of party, was that she wanted a more "traditional" nationalist party. A significant portion of the BNP membership think it has liberalised quite enough. To go any further would mean having a Black Section, apparently.

I certainly do not think she was telling lies about her experience of living in Brockley, sandwiched as she was between two bad black neighbours.

The only thing I would question is whether the abuse she suffered from unpleasant black neighbours would have been more bearable if they had been meted out by unpleasant white neighbours.

The Lib-Lab-Con was blamed for the nation's ills, and I was delighted to hear her questioning the necessity of Nick Griffin condolences to David Cameron on the death of his son Ivan. She speculated that it would not have been welcomed and should not have been sent, because Cameron's lot as well as Labour were after all the traitors who have for decades allowed liberal policies to spread like a cancer.

Tessa Culnane appears to share my view that the lives of those who could have grown into productive adults have been ruined and sacrificed by liberal policies, which have instead encouraged crime and feckless behaviour from all races, faiths and classes.

I share her view, stated with such ringing, simple conviction, that liberal policies (which she calls multiculturalism) have failed the white working classes. Indeed, they have failed everyone they were intended to benefit - the lower classes and the criminal elements as well as the victims of the criminal elements (who are inevitably the law-abiding lower classes).

The irony of course is that the Muslims whom they fear and hate, feel exactly the same way about liberal policies too! Their deliberate policy of insisting on having an identifiable and alienating Muslim look of beard, hijab and burqa, is rooted in the same distaste and rejection for liberalism. It is not so much a badge of Islam, but a badge that declares that you reject liberal values.

Tessa Culnane is an impressive and dignified lady with a hardcore of sweetness, and it is easy to speak well when you speak from the heart.

Saturday, 11 April 2009

Where are the leaders of the white people? asked Sayeeda Warsi

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/mar/28/cameron-conservatives-sayeeda-warsi

She says it's Labour's attitude to ethnic minorities that make her more aware than anything why she's a Tory. "I find their views quite uncomfortable. I was with Alan Johnson on Question Time, who's a lovely man, actually, and he was asking what the 'leaders of the Muslim community' felt and I said the Muslim community do not have leaders. What is this? Are we some kind of freak nation that bows down to our leaders? And he said the African-Caribbean community have their leaders and so and so have their leaders and I thought, I couldn't sit in a cabinet of people who still think like that; that somehow there are these alien groups in our nation, each of them represented by a leader who talked to the government on their behalf . It's almost the kind of approach of 'we know what's best for you brown people.' I find that patronising. On Question Time I said where are the leaders of the white people and they all went: 'er, let's move on'.

Wow. Is there a Sayeeda Warsi Fan Club I can join?

I wonder what she thinks of direct democracy, so we are not subject to the amoral decisions of any of our corrupt self-seeking leaders, just our consciences and our reason.

Perhaps Tim Winter AKA Abdal Hakim Murad can give us a fatwa on whether direct democracy could ever be unIslamic?

I would have thought the Koran's warning against people schismatically dividing themselves into sects and rejoicing in their own doctrines is a conclusive enough endorsement of government by referenda, by God Himself, if you believe in Him.

023.053

YUSUFALI: But people have cut off their affair (of unity), between them, into sects: each party rejoices in that which is with itself.

PICKTHAL: But they (mankind) have broken their religion among them into sects, each group rejoicing in its tenets.

SHAKIR: But they cut off their religion among themselves into sects, each part rejoicing in that which is with them.

045.017
YUSUFALI: And We granted them Clear Signs in affairs (of Religion): it was only after knowledge had been granted to them that they fell into schisms, through insolent envy among themselves. Verily thy Lord will judge between them on the Day of Judgment as to those matters in which they set up differences.


PICKTHAL: And gave them plain commandments. And they differed not until after the knowledge came unto them, through rivalry among themselves. Lo! thy Lord will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection concerning that wherein they used to differ.


SHAKIR: And We gave them clear arguments in the affair, but they did not differ until after knowledge had come to them out of envy among themselves; surely your -Lord will judge between them on the day of resurrection concerning that wherein they differed.

Friday, 10 April 2009

No Mercy for Madonna

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1167729/Madonna-met-silent-Guy-arrives-Britain.html

This story demonstrates precisely the perversity of our age.

There was nearly a national day of mourning for the death of Ivan Cameron, the 6 year old whom everyone knew would never speak or move.

At the death of Baby P, the great British public were spitting and hissing about how social services and Ofsted had failed him and other children like him.

But we can all imagine, can we not, what sort of adult or feral youth Baby P would have grown into? It is quite probable he would have turned into one of the boys who caught and killed Jamie Bulger for fun.

So that was another blessing in disguise.

For some reason, Madonna not getting Mercy from Malawi was hailed as a great triumph of social services over Madonna by the Madonna-haters.

It seems the unspoken assumption is that social services must play God over the lives of orphaned and abandoned children and desperate couples looking for a child to adopt.

The very idea that adoptive parents should go and pick one that they both liked the look of, as we would if we were going to Battersea Dogs' Home to pick a pet, is somehow offensive to the social workers, who require that at least 3 years to elapse before parents can be deemed fit to adopt.

By that time the adoptive parents will have given up, divorced, or lost the will to live. The child in question will of course have been psychologically damaged by its time in care under the ministrations of social services and its care home paedophiles.

Mercy as an adult living in Malawi in low-born circumstances would no doubt be wondering what might have been if the interfering busybodies had allowed Madonna to take her home, and what perversity of reasoning, spite and envy possesses the British public to cheer the denial of Madonna's application.

Britishness on Radio 4

The other day an Asian from Leicestershire was on the programme saying he would vote BNP.

It seems he thinks the white working classes are only asking for what a typical Pakistani or Indian would be asking for, in their own country, and he didn't see any harm in it, though he was aware they would try to "send him home".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00jhpj3

Such courage and fair mindedness is certainly rare amongst the indigenous white race, who would be falling over each other to denounce anyone supporting the BNP as racist, evil and xenophobic at every opportunity.

It is a delicious irony and must be very confusing for ethno-nationalists.

Perhaps one supportive statement for the BNP by a non-white is worth more than 10 whites saying they support the BNP.

Even the BNP needs foreigners, if only to get elected. This point was made rather well in a recent issue of Private Eye showing Paul Golding (who won the Swanley by election) with a speech bubble saying "I like foreigners. If it weren't for them, we wouldn't have been elected" or words to that effect.

Compassionate Conservatism, Nicey-nicey Nationalism?

http://digg.com/politics/BNP_The_Nasty_Party?FC=PRCP0

http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=8644741474&topic=10324&post=95492

It would appear that Jeff Marshall's comments here and elsewhere are being discussed and that there is some confusion about his identity. Jeff Marshall is indeed the BNP Organiser for Central London who has been known to enter mosques to see what the other lot of social pariahs are up to.

There is a view amongst some that he could not possibly be hanging around here since this blog is perceived to be pro-Muslim.

Those in the know will already be aware that the BNP online activists are everywhere!

Some of them convert to Islam in prison, others marry non-whites, yet others embrace Creationism and some of them have strangely EU-friendly views. Why, the BNP Chairman, like me, entertains ambitions of becoming MEP!

So Nick Griffin was offering condolences to David Cameron for the death of Ivan, was he?

Gah, even the BNP are falling over each other to seem compassionate!

As I have suspected, nationalism as the BNP understand it, is nothing to do with acting in the long-term national interest, but is really a more a "socialism and welfare state for whites only" policy.

But that was what caused the influx of foreign labour in the first place! The white working class were too busy claiming benefits to want to do the jobs that the immigrants wanted to do. That was why they kept coming and that is why they keep coming.

Even now - in the midst of a Credit Crunch - the British Chamber of Commerce are plotting and scheming to hire foreign labour!

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/how-you-pay-for-the-importation-of-foreign-workers/

Curiouser and curiouser, but I am sure it is a lot to do with the quality of the indigenous workforce, and the "quality" of British "education" ....

It is not just the British Chamber of Commerce, though. A successful joiner from Essex I chatted to in a pub once categorically told me that he would never hire a local. Poles are the best workers, then come the Hungarians, then the Rumanians, but never an Albanian or a local, if you can possibly avoid it ....

Thursday, 9 April 2009

The Libertarian position against eugenics

My post on the subject

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2009/02/sympathy-for-caring-compassionate.html

indirectly led to this article appearing about Jeff Marshall in Searchlight.

http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/index.php?link=template&story=275

where he was taken to task. I had said in my post that in the same circumstances as David Cameron I would have committed infanticide, or asked the doctors to discreetly take the matter off my hands, as it were.

This was what Searchlight said of Jeff Marshall:

In a cruel and warped outburst against those who had expressed their condolences at the death of Ivan Cameron, Jeff Marshall (pictured), the central London BNP organiser, who lives in Whitechapel, wrote: “We live in a country today which is unhealthily dominated by an excess of sentimentality towards the weak and unproductive. No good will come of it.”

Not content with attacking those mourning the death of a severely disabled child who brought “joy and love to those around him”, Marshall continued in his sick tirade, stating that although it would be “a kindness” to kill children with disabilities, this was not the same as advocating such a measure as compulsory state policy. “But so what if it is,” he asked. “At least we would all know where we stand. There is actually not a great deal of point in keeping these sort of people alive, after all.”

I must make it clear that I would be against any say by the state over what parents do with their disabled children.

Were I in charge, I would certainly allow parents to rear their disabled children as pets, to be used as badges of compassion and martyrdom. They are free to turn their disabled children into objects useful for extracting pity and attention from friends, relatives and voters, if that is what they wish, provided it is at their own expense.

My position is therefore rigorously neutral and Libertarian. I do not share Jeff Marshall's apparent indifference to eugenics becoming state policy and would be vehement in my opposition.

Sunday, 5 April 2009

Abu Qatada "jail propaganda" denied

http://www.speroforum.com/site/article.asp?id=15663

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5jwx7p8ZiCJ17lSVltuNZCw1_FZvQ

I frankly do not find Abu Qatada's views that Muslim should not be in the armed forces of any country who is an ally of Israel and the US (and this means us!) offensive or extreme.

It is commonsense really. I would regard myself as having wasted my time as a parent were any child of mine to declare an ambition to enter the armed forces (and be sent to invade Muslim countries in ruinous, futile and unpopular wars), become a porn star, a lap dancer, a single mother or enter X Factor.

Where I find myself at a parting of ways with him is when he issued an opinion on an Algerian cleric's fatwa in 1994, in which he backed the view that the killing of women and children by militants in Algeria was justified.

What do he and his supporters have to say about that?

Anjem Choudary of http://www.islam4uk.com/ was asked at 0744hrs 5 April 2009: "Jason Burke's Al Qaeda p166 says Abu Qutada backed Algerian cleric's view that killing of women and children by militants in Algeria justified. Would you comment please?"

His response at 1102hrs 5 April 2009 was a simple "No".

Another question sent at 10:30hrs 5 April 2009: "Why not? Is it because you don't wish to defend such an indefensible view?"

and another sent at 1108 hrs 5 April 2009: "Or do you think the ends justify the means - an unIslamic view, surely?"

Neither questions received a response.

Friday, 3 April 2009

Marital Discipline through Flogging

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/02/taliban-pakistan-justice-women-flogging

It is NOT in the Koran that you are to be lashed for merely being in a position to commit adultery.

It must have been the case that pre-Islam, the Afghans would flog each other over trifling matters such as dropping litter and subsequently adapted Islam to their customs.

I repeat, there is nothing in the Koran that says "flog a woman 34 times for putting herself in a position where she could have committed adultery".

It does however say in the Koran that 100 lashes are to be administered for convicted adulterers and 80 lashes for falsely accusing someone of adultery.

Under such a system, I would argue that victims of adultery be personally allowed to administer these punishments in the privacy of the bedchamber. I know for a fact that quite a fetish is made of discipline and the sex industry caters very well for this preference in men such as Sir Max Mosley. I do not doubt that quite a few women also like this sort of thing, if it is not too harshly administered.

It may even spice up a flagging sex life and bring the couple back together again.

Who knows, many of the witnesses to the flogging may have found themselves quite, er, uplifted, by the experience of hearing the shrieks of a woman receiving her punishment on her bottom wearing red pants, and hearing the smack of the lash upon her flesh ....

Thursday, 2 April 2009

"Assisted suicide is a marvellous possibility" - for bankers and warmongering politicians?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7977017.stm

I can't understand what the fuss is all about. On the one hand we wring our hands about

  1. global warming caused by
  2. over-population
  3. the unproductive nature of unproductive people suffering from, for example, terminal illnesses, dementia, insanity
  4. the ability of productive citizens to support growing numbers of the unproductive

and on the other wring our hands about assisted suicide possibly not being the "marvellous opportunity" Ludwig Minelli claims it is.

Sometimes, suicide is the only honourable way out.

Examples that come to mind are:

1. Hitler (who preferred not to have to ask the German people to forgive him or the Allies to spare him when he knew the game was up)

2. Roman Generals (who "fell on their swords" and had slaves present to assist them)

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/133350.html

3. Japanese warriors (who committed harakiri or sepukku)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seppuku

4. The mother who committed suicide after she gave her 3 year old daughter so much wine she died. (I cannot find a reference of this online but remember reading about it in the Telegraph in the 1990s.)

In my opinion now seems a marvellous opportunity for suggesting this "marvellous opportunity" to people such as Lord Myners, Fred the Shred, Bush, Blair, Brown, anyone in a position of power who was responsible for policies leading to the Credit Crunch, and those responsible for decades of US and UK foreign policy in the Middle East after WW2 that led to 9/11, including all the MPs who voted for the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan ...

The rules of succession and a British and Muslim monarch

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7966987.stm

I predict that the politicians will be too busy dealing with the effects of quantitative easing to get round to changing the rules of succession, which it is claimed discriminates against women and Catholics.

Interestingly, the current rules do not exclude a Muslim monarch. But I would bet that even if the politicians got round to changing the rules of succession, they would even then not, for Politically Correct reasons, not explicitly state they would exclude a Muslim monarch.

This means that were Charles minded to cause a constitutional crisis, he could easily do so. It is just a matter of time before more sensible, educated white Britons, such as Tim Winter AKA Abdal Hakim Murad, acknowledge that the Europeans have adopted the inferior version of monotheism when a better one was available all along.

Napoleon Hill, author of Think and Grow Rich, said so as long ago as 1937.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2009-03-27T08%3A35%3A00Z&max-results=7


Once that idea takes hold, the genie will be out of the bottle, and the BNP themselves will be wanting to establish their own version of Islam, perhaps, with their own Nationalist Islamist Adviser ...

They would not be the first political movement to use Islam as an ideological weapon, for the black separatist movement - The Nation of Islam - the one Muhammad Ali joined, has already beaten them to it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation_of_Islam

Cameron's comments about the benefits of Islamic values (which by definition include Christian values, ie the ones that the British have long abandoned and forgotten about) is just the thin end of the wedge.

It would appear that Cameron is yet another voice saying that the future is not Orange, but Islam ...

Shock horror! Cameron endorses Islamic values at the expense of "British" values!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/may/13/comment.communities

If being British is public drunkenness, obesity, pornography, feral youth, underaged sex, single parenthood, educational under-achievement etc and being Muslim is sobriety, moderation, chastity, charity and family values, it seems that the BNP still thinks being British remains vastly superior. Is this on racial or cultural grounds then?

I wonder if the BNP is even intellectually capable of making that distinction as it cannot even make the distinction between race and nation. One is of course visible and the other is conceptual, ie requiring thought and definition.

White people can be as illegitimate, intoxicated, indigent and indolent as they like and still be inherently superior to non-whites, can they?

This seems to be the BNP view.

Cameron clearly thinks that the future is not Orange, it is Muslim.

Perhaps Cameron thinks Islamic values include the Christian values this country has long since abandoned and forgotten about, who knows?

You will not be surprised that the BNP is determined not to accept this line of reasoning and would rather embrace fundamentalist Christianity and have Creationism taught in British schools. At least the Muslims have no such perverse desire to cut off their noses (of racism) to spite their faces (of knowledge and scientific enquiry).

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/03/tory-shadow-minister-named-as-“britains-most-powerful-muslim-woman”/

The Zionists of New York being interviewed by a Jew of New York

The title is significant.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FABqq_jjRRo

Put burqas on these people and they would be just like those Muslims we love to hate screaming "Behead the Infidel", I thought.

The fact is that Israel does no good to anyone at all.

In fact, its very "democracy" makes it unstable, for the current government dissociates itself from the actions and promises of previous governments. If Israel were a one-party dictatorship, then the Palestinians would either have been exterminated and forgotten about, or appeased and now living peacefully with the Israelis. Instead, Israel swings from being dove to hawk, after decades of unstable coalitions and vacillation.

Perhaps it is the kind of "democracy" we practice that is the problem. In fact, I am sure it is. Our "democracy" is a farce and a sham, and it is time we acknowledged how powerless we all are: the voters who have no real choice, and the "ordinary" politicians who know they have no real power.

http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2009/03/200931644830994751.html