Translate

Thursday, 31 January 2013

Claire Khaw may be Agony Aunt at new nationalist community website

http://planbritain.com/classifieds/ad-category/community/agony-aunt/

I had to laugh when I clicked the link and saw an advertisement for the book of Jessica Thom, the Tourette's sufferer who had me incarcerated at Peckham Police Station for a day on 24 January!

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/my-arrest-at-0740-on-24-january-by-five.html

My arrest at 0740 on 24 January by five policemen for the offence of offending Jessica Thom and other Tourette's sufferers

This page was created by my former associate David Jones on 26 January.  He describes himself as a libertarian but is either so confused or without principle that he gloats at my arrest because we have fallen out.   He will be trying yet again to become councilor this time in Cornholme Ward in Todmorden in May 2013.

I was arrested at 0740 on 24 January, taken to Peckham Police Station and finally released at 2136 after a two-hour interview.  I was offered the option of making an apology and receiving only a caution, but felt I had a right to say what I did and refused.   I have not been charged and am due to answer bail  on 7 March.


David Jones the self-proclaimed libertarian superimposes prison bars on my image because he thinks it is quite right  that someone should be arrested for publishing what I did about Jessica Thom.  I believe he even hopes that I will be executed. 


It was a bit like that.

This rather amusing picture was created by David Jones, my former associate.  They brought me Tetley tea, scampi and chips finished off by spotted dick and custard.   I have no complaints about my treatment.  Peckham Police Station seems well run; the policemen were handsome, and the policewomen pretty.   The WPC who arrested me was really one of the nicest women I have ever met.

This is a photo from the Facebook group of David Jones dedicated to the purpose of having me jailed *and*  banished form Britain.   It  would be difficult to do both at the same time, I imagine.  

The surprisingly orthopaedic mattress and pillow in Cell 9.  David Jones boasted that he destroyed his when he was held for electoral fraud at Halifax Police Station, but I just did the sensible thing with them and used them for the purpose for which they were created, namely for lying on and contemplating the ceiling.  
A view of Cell 9 lying on the mattress

A view of Cell 9 lying on the mattress looking at the loo

A view of Cell 9 looking at the mattress from the door

On 17 January the post complained of at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/how-many-people-think-jessica-thoms.html by Tourette's sufferer Jessica Thom was removed.  Yesterday, 30 January,  it was briefly displayed before being removed again.   


Jessica Thom's book can be purchased at 

Hugh Muir of the Guardian mentions my arrest at 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jan/29/hugh-muir-diary-murdoch-times


I have already been mentioned THREE times in January 2013 by Hugh Muir in The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jan/02/hugh-muir-diary-bnp-conservatives
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jan/04/hugh-muir-diary-nigel-farage-card
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jan/29/hugh-muir-diary-murdoch-times


https://www.facebook.com/notes/claire-khaw/how-many-people-think-jessica-thom-the-biscuit-woman-is-putting-it-on-to-avoid-h/456623547745617 was what got me into trouble, reproduced below.

How many people think Jessica Thom the biscuit woman is putting it on to avoid her responsibilities of being a normal person?

22 April 2013 at 20:23
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12846961
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01pgq2v


Is Jessica Thom, a clearly intelligent woman, putting on her Tourette’s syndrome on to avoid  the responsibilities of being a normal citizen with the usual responsibilities of life?  In a more sensible age she would have been shunned.  In our era of matriarchal dementia, she is being privileged.   I think she is using it to avoid having to find a husband and the horror of having sex with a series of frogs to find a decent one.   In a way, I understand.

Here she is at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JrfFk2ZKDpk


Do you think you could do what she does without suffering from Tourette’s?

How would she feel if she were suddenly “cured”?

Would she then become totally unremarkable and lose all her privileges?

Would you want to be “cured” if you were her?

Do you think if we could bribe her with something sufficiently enticing, such as a lot of money, or the car or the man or the holiday of her dreams, she would and could cure herself?

To discuss these and related issues, as well as to vote YES or NO, please join http://www.facebook.com/groups/466234513398453/permalink/512860475402523/?comment_id=512860565402514&notif_t=like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYF7E4xsdkI

Listen to Jessica Thom say “fuck” a lot to music.   Would you want your kid to be like that?   Would you tell your kid that it is OK to be like that?   Biscuit!

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Tourettes-Syndrome-poor-impulse-control-and-attention-seeking/488217111222294 is the Facebook page I have set up to so that this issue can be discussed without censorship.  Jessica Thom should know that it also advertises her book Welcome To Biscuit Land, and it is hoped that this knowledge will restrain her and her more censorious female friends from trying to get the page reported and deleted.

I only ask questions.  If it is really the case that we cannot even ask questions then we really might as well say goodbye to Western civilisation.

There are polls that should be of interest to Tourette’s suffers and those who have views on Tourette’s sufferers.

It has been crazy the number of people who have said to me “I have Tourette’s and so does my partner and so do my children.”

If Tourette’s is something that isn’t being faked, then it is genetic and neurological.   If it is genetic and neurological, then it can be passed on.  It is my opinion that people with Tourette’s should neither get married nor have children.   Will I get another death threat for just saying that?

What kind of person marries someone with Tourette’s?

Another person with Tourette’s?

This means that their children will be very likely to get Tourette’s.  Why does the government allow this?

Why?

I don’t understand.

Wednesday, 23 January 2013

The Party of David Cameron British Prime Minister has NO PRINCIPLES


The Labour Party have their principles at http://www.labour.ie/party/constitution.html

The LibDems have theirs at http://www.libdems.org.uk/constitution.aspx

UKIP have theirs at http://www.ukip.org/content/manifestos-and-literature/1410-ukip-constitution

The BNP have theirs at
http://www.bnp.org.uk/sites/default/files/final_amended_12.3_constitution_19.10.11.pdf

Where are the Conservative Party’s?

Stephen Phillips, Secretary of the Board of the Conservative Party, repeatedly refuses to tell me:

1.  in what way I have acted in a way that is "wholly inconsistent with the aims, objectives and principles of the Conservative Party"; nor will he tell me

2. what are the aims, objectives and principles of the Conservative Party

If I have infringed against X, then surely I must be told what X is?

Don't they know what their principles are?

Don't they have any?

If the Conservative Party has no principles, then I have infringed no principles.  As I suspected, my expulsion from the party was all a terrible mistake.

When they recognise their terrible mistake and reinstate me, I shall of course see to it that they have principles that are recognisably Conservative.    

After all, if they have lost all their principles or never had any, might it not be a time to acquire some before the next General Election?

Can the Prime Minister of Britain really be a leader of a party that has no principles?

Does that not make Britain and the British an international laughing stock?

Tuesday, 22 January 2013

Should nationalists join the Judean People's Front or the People's Front of Judea?

Why I am still a nationalist

Whatever the state of relations between me and other nationalists, I like to think I am at least capable of separating the abstraction that is the long-term national interest from the nationalists who take wrong turnings in their lives and who suffer from a range of emotional, psychological and possibly substance abuse problems.

I was very touched to have been invited a BNP reunion on Sunday.  In fact, only one of our number - there were five of us - is actually still in the party.

That does seem to mean I am in reasonably good standing with some of the people I used to know to have been invited in the first place.  I had left the party rather under a cloud after having been expelled, later associating with and then subsequently falling out with Dave Jones, formerly of the British People's Party.

I am therefore simultaneously grateful and surprised, proud yet humbled.

What is a nationalist?

Someone who wishes to promote the long-term national interest with a combination of pragmatic policies that does not adhere to traditionally confused ideas of "right" and "left".

I like to think that nationalism is but common sense.  If nationalism is being marginalised and nationalists abused and mocked, then so too are common sense and people of good sense .

Any ideology that prides itself on going against common sense while refusing to engage in a reasoned debate is clearly dishonest and destructive eg feminism and liberalism.  

It is time to storm their citadel, which is already rotten with corruption and dementia.  

Sex and Feminism


"There is object proof that homosexuality is more interesting than heterosexuality. It's that one knows a considerable number of heterosexuals who would wish to become homosexuals, whereas one knows very few homosexuals who would really like to become heterosexuals."
—Michel Foucault

"Men are run ragged by female sexuality all their lives. From the beginning of his life to the end, no man ever fully commands any woman. It's an illusion. Men are pussy-whipped. And they know it. That's what the strip clubs are about; not woman as victim, not woman as slave, but woman as goddess."
—Camille Paglia

"The feminist line is, strippers and topless dancers are degraded, subordinated, and enslaved; they are victims, turned into objects by the display of their anatomy. But women are far from being victims — women rule; they are in total control ... the feminist analysis of prostitution says that men are using money as power over women. I'd say, yes, that's all that men have. The money is a confession of weakness. They have to buy women's attention. It's not a sign of power; it's a sign of weakness."
—Camille Paglia

"Leaving sex to the feminists is like letting your dog vacation at the taxidermist."
—Camille Puglia

"Every man harbors an inner female territory ruled by his mother, from whom he can never entirely break free."
—Camille Paglia

"Nature is a Darwinian spectacle of the eaters and the eaten. All phases of procreation are ruled by appetite: sexual intercourse, from kissing to penetration, consists of movements of barely controlled cruelty and consumption. The long pregnancy of the human female and the protracted childhood of her infant, who is not self-sustaining for seven years or more, have produced the agon of psychological dependency that burdens the male for a lifetime. Man justifiably fears being devoured by woman, who is nature’s proxy."
—Camille Paglia

"The mystique of the femme fatale cannot be perfectly translated into male terms."
—Camille Paglia

"The Devil is a woman."
—Camille Paglia

"We have an evolutionary revulsion from slime, the site of our biologic origins. Every month, it is woman's fate to face the abyss of time and being, the abyss which is herself."
—Camille Paglia

"Western culture from the start has swerved from femaleness. The last western society to worship female powers was Minoan Crete. And significantly, that fell and did not rise again."
—Camille Paglia

"Modern liberalism suffers unresolved contradictions. It exalts individualism and freedom and, on its radical wing, condemns social orders as oppressive. On the other hand, it expects governments to provide materially for all, a feat manageable only by an expansion of authority and a swollen bureaucracy. In other words, liberalism defines government as tyrant father but demands it behave as nurturant mother. Feminism has inherited these contradictions."
—Camille Paglia

"Sexual freedom, sexual liberation. A modern delusion. We are hierarchical animals. Sweep one hierarchy away, and another will take its place, perhaps less palatable than the first."
—Camille Paglia

"The search for freedom through sex is doomed to failure."
—Camille Paglia

"Freud says: 'Man fears that his strength will be taken from him by woman, dreads becoming infected with her femininity and then proving himself a weakling.' Masculinity must fight off effeminacy day by day. Woman and nature stand ever ready to reduce the male to boy and infant."
—Camille Paglia

"One of feminism’s irritating reflexes is its fashionable disdain for 'patriarchal society', to which nothing good is ever attributed. But it is patriarchal society that has freed me as a woman. It is capitalism that has given me the leisure to sit at this desk writing this book. Let us stop being small-minded about men and freely acknowledge what treasures their obsessiveness has poured into culture."
—Camille Paglia

"Contemporary feminists, who are generally poor or narrowly trained scholars, insist on viewing history as a weepy scenario of male oppression and female victimization. But it is more accurate to see men, driven by sexual anxiety away from their mothers, forming group alliances by male bonding to create complex structures of society, art, science and technology."
—Camille Paglia

"When feminism and gay activism set themselves against organized religion, they have the obligation to put something better in its place."
—Camille Paglia

"[W]omen will never be taken seriously until they accept full responsibility for their sexuality."
—Camille Paglia

"Rape is an outrage that cannot be tolerated in a civilized society. Yet feminism, which has waged a crusade for rape to be taken more seriously, has put young women in danger by hiding the truth about sex from them."
—Camille Paglia

"I do not believe in God, but I believe God is man’s greatest idea. Those incapable of religious feeling or those (like hard-core gay activists) who profane sacred ground do not have the imagination to educate the young. Until the Left comes to its senses about the cultural power of religion, the Right will continue to broaden its appeal."
—Camille Paglia

"What feminism calls patriarchy is simply civilization, an abstract system designed by men but augmented and now co-owned by women."
—Camille Paglia

"Man has traditionally ruled the social sphere; feminism tells him to move over and share his power. But woman rules the sexual and emotional sphere, and there she has no rival. Victim ideology, a caricature of social history, blocks women from recognition of their dominance in the deepest, most important realm."
—Camille Paglia

"Films of the mating behavior of most other species — a staple of public television of America — demonstrate that the female chooses. Males pursue, show off, brawl, scuffle, and make general fools of themselves for love. A major failing of most feminist ideology is its dumb, ungenerous stereotyping of men as tyrants and abusers, when in fact — as I know full well from my own mortifying lesbian experience — men are tormented by women’s flirtatiousness and heming and hawing, their manipulations and changeableness, their humiliating rejections. Cock teasing is a universal reality. It is part of women’s merciless testing and cold-eyed comparison shopping for potential mates. Men will do anything to win the favor of women."
—Camille Paglia

"In pondering why a battered woman does not leave, we must remember that gay men with a taste for violent “rough trade” have always paid for this kind of sex. Are women so perfect and angelic that we cannot imagine them having sadomasochistic impulses? When they are genuinely victimized, women deserve our pity. But victimization alone cannot explain everything in the tragicomedy of love."
—Camille Paglia

"Far from poisoning the mind, pornography shows the deepest truth about sexuality, stripped of romantic veneer."
—Camille Paglia

"The idea that feminism — that liberation from domestic prison — is going to bring happiness is just wrong. Women have advanced a great deal, but they are no happier. The happiest women I know are not those who are balancing their careers and families, like a lot of my friends are. The happiest people I know are the women — like my cousins — who have a high school education, got married immediately graduating and never went to college. They are very religious and they never question their Catholicism. They do not regard the house as a prison. I look at my friends who are on the fast track. They are desperate, frenzied and frazzled, the most unhappy women who have ever existed. They work nights and weekends and have no lives. Some of them have children who are raised by nannies. The entire feminist culture says that the most important woman is the woman with an attache case. I want to empower the woman who wants to say, 'I'm tired of this and I want to go home.' The far right is correct when it says the price of women's liberation is being paid by the children."
—Camille Paglia

Sunday, 20 January 2013

Feminism, Sluts and Immigration


I was disabled from commenting on Facebook for saying:

“All women are prostitutes, and all men are punters. This is no tragedy, for it was always ever thus. The tragedy for a woman is to sell herself too cheaply or to price herself right out of the market. The tragedy for a man is to not get value for his money or do the equivalent of buying a car he cannot afford to run.”

Do you just get the feeling it was a woman who reported me?  I wonder if it is still allowed to say that, on the whole, it seems that women are more censorious than men.

This is considered a worthy subject for discussion after all at

http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110311020217AAYSFwV

and at

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201103/are-all-women-essentially-prostitutes

but you wouldn't expect a woman, especially if she is a slut, to agree, would you?

Perhaps I should have just asked the question:

“Are women prostitutes?”

This would no doubt have been considered offensive and attracted another Facebook punishment, so perhaps I should have asked the converse, which would have been:

“Are men punters?”

Then no one would have offended at all, because no one cares if men are insulted, only when women are.

What do men ever want from women but sex?

If it is the case that men are only ever after The One Thing, ie sex, then does that not make women prepared to give them sex if certain conditions are satisfied prostitutes?

If a woman has an official life-long exclusive contract then she is a wife, who has rather more onerous duties than a mere prostitute, since her side of the bargain will also involve housekeeping and childcare.

If she has a one-off contract then she is a prostitute if money changes hands after the act.

The woman who gives sex and does not ask for payment is a slut.

A prostitute should be considered a degree above a slut because the essence of a slut is that she is a fornicatress and stupid, while a prostitute at least had the sense to ask for money in return for the provision of sexual services.

If you allow stupid women to breed then their offspring will be half full of stupid slut genes and your society will be saddled with the stupid, learning-disabled and also the depraved.

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2011/05/shock-horror-britons-getting-5-more.html

This means the next generation will be degenerate and the one after that even more degenerate exponentially http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_growth if you allow this practice to go unchecked, or, if you promote this practice through the aegis of the welfare state.

What is the other reason why is it a Bad Thing for women to give sex to men for free?

Because it corrupts their nature which in turn corrupts society.

When their society is corrupted they will desecrate marriage.

When they desecrate marriage they will lose their traditions.

When they lose their traditions they will lose their memory.

When they lose their memory they will suffer dementia.

When they suffer dementia their society, race, nations will be held in contempt by other societies, races and nations, and that will be the end of their civilisation.

So, this is the reason why sluts are a Bad Thing.

Did you know that feminism says it is OK for women to be sluts?

Did you know that some feminists would even deny the concept of a “slut” claiming that a woman has an absolute right to do anything with her body without being criticised for it?

Of course, these feminists do not think they owe society a duty, much less men, or children or the elderly, or anyone at all.   These women are after all ambitious and selfish women who want to compete unfairly with men with the sledgehammer of totalitarian anti-discrimination legislation.

A slut is a fornicatress.

What is a fornicatress?  A fornicatress is a woman who has sex with men not her husband.

Why is this a Bad Thing?

Because if we say it is OK for women to be fornicatresses then we will be swept away in a tsunami of sluttery and bastardy, even with the availability of modern contraception.

When you are overwhelmed by a tsunami of sluttery and bastardy it will no longer be socially acceptable to criticise sluts.

This is when your society loses its memory and forgets the meaning of fornication.

Remember: all fornicatresses are sluts, and sluts are stupid.

If sex were a drug, then a slut would be a drug-dealer who consumes her own stock and becomes a drug addict rather than finding an exclusive and regular customer who will pay her the highest price.

If you wonder why there is more crime and more learning-disabled people around now, look at the sluts around you who make bad reproductive choices by fucking maniacs and losers who are not their husbands and then neglect to bring up their illegitimate offspring properly because they are single mums.


Nor will they have enough children because they will be too busy being working mothers who will become divorced mothers who will become single mothers.

Many clever women will end up not having children at all, while the stupid ones breed in large numbers.


They are the cause of our Culture of Entitlement and Excuses.

They are also the cause of immigration because the indigenous working classes are no longer fit for purpose.

Why else do successive governments conspire to promote immigration even as they know their voters dislike it?

Because most of their voters are sluts and bastards or the sex partners, friends and family of sluts and bastards.

The leaders of political parties don’t want to offend these voters when all they want is a referendum on the EU, or a smaller state, or to repatriate other races, or whatever it is that they want.

After all, most men secretly or not so secretly like sluts because they lower the price of sex, which is what most men want from women most of the time, if they are not homosexual.  Sluts, already having low standards of sexual morality will be indifferent to homosexual men having sex with each other, because they are too stupid to see that sexual liberation is bad for their society.

This rather explains why, in The Land of Compulsory Fornication that is Paedo Bastard Britain Slutland, most people do not find the very idea of “gay marriage” at all offensive.

“The lower the morals of women, the lower the morals of men.”

The Bhagavad Gita:

“Out of the corruption of women proceeds the corruption of races; out of the corruption of races, the loss of memory; out of the loss of memory, the loss of understanding, and out of this all evil.”

Marriage and Civilisation


When we desecrate marriage we lose our traditions.

When we lose our traditions, we lose our memory.

When we lose our memory, we lose our mind.

When we lose our mind, we are held in contempt by other races and nations.

We suffer dementia when we say it is OK for women to be SSMs.

What are SSMs?  



Follow me on Tumblr at http://www.tumblr.com/blog/thevoiceofreason-ann

Follow me on Tumblr because Facebook keep disabling me from commenting just for  saying things like:




Saturday, 19 January 2013

Nationalists who wish to remain politically active should join mainstream parties to subvert their liberal agenda from within

Any reading of Hope Not Hate will show that nationalism outside UKIP is in a state of deep disarray, afflicted by arrests, scandals, ideological confusion as they are.

If you are educated, personable, intelligent and don't mind joining the mainstream  parties in order to subvert their liberal agenda, then you should join the LibLabCon or UKIP and subscribe to this blog so that you are ideologically aware and effective at persuasion.   

If you have been a member of UKIP's prohibited list of parties at http://www.ukip.org/helpukip you should just join the LibLabCon if you can bear to.  

"Membership is not available to anyone who is or has previously been a member of
  • the British National Party
  • National Front
  • British Freedom Party
  • British People's Party
  • English Defence League
  • Britain First or 
  • the UK First Party. 
Any applications made from people who are or have been members of these organisations will be refused, and any subscriptions collected will be refunded.

By applying for membership you certify that you are not and have never been a member of either of these parties."

From within the party you can change the views of the leadership and have access to more hearts and minds than if you were in one of those pariah  parties.

If you cannot bear to do that, and cannot bear not to be among like-minded people then then by all means be exploited by the likes of Nick Griffin and suffer the indignities of being mocked by the Reds and Far Left, as you wish.  At least you will enjoy a sense of comradeship, eh?  

Until you fall out with your former comrades.

As you can see from the exchange below, they are not really the best of kind of people, nor do they always act rationally or consistently.  Their grasp of the concept of principle is often confused with the personal.   You have been warned.

Angela Bray MP of Ealing Central and Acton prepares to say NO to gay marriage

http://www.angiebray.org.uk/news/newsletter-archive/80
Angie Bray invites her constituents
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Borough_of_Ealing#Demographics to give her their views on gay marriage so she does not have to stick her head above the parapet.

To some she would be considered pragmatic and modern.  To others she would be considered hypocritical and cowardly.

"I vos only following the orders of my constituents!"

"I vos only following the orders of mein fuhrer!"

"I am a politician with no views of my own!  I only follow orders!"

No principles, no courage, no spine, no backbone.

Fewer women like her in politics from now on, please.

She also lives with her "partner", Nigel.  I wonder what her views are about Slut Single Mums as described at https://www.facebook.com/pages/Are-Slut-Single-Mothers-a-burden-on-the-state/220271251432495?fref=ts

South Tees Conservatives now BOAST about imposing HIGHER taxes than Labour


https://www.facebook.com/southteesconservatives


What are the aims, values and principles of the Conservative Party?  I think we should be told.

South Tees Conservatives
EXPOSING LABOUR HYPOCRISY: the top rate of tax was 40% for 12 years and 11 months of the last Labour government (May 1997 - April 2010). From April this year it will be 45%. Those with the broadest shoulders will still pay more in tax under the Conservatives than they did under Labour.
3

Friday, 18 January 2013

BNP Councillor Richard Perry warmly welcomed by 6th form college when he gave a talk to A level politics students

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/national/warm-welcome-bnp

As you can see from the video, he was very pleased with the reception he received and the topics discussed.

Strangely, the name and location of the college was never mentioned.

Anyway, I do hope that Richard Perry is invited again next year and that the career of the young maverick head of politics who invited him is not in any way blighted by this bold initiative.   

Thursday, 17 January 2013

Conservative Future National Chairman Elections - March 2013

On what basis should the National Chairman of Conservative Future be chosen?

I suggest to the one who best answers these questions:

  1. What are the aims, objectives and principles of the Conservative Party?
  2. What have I said or done that is "wholly inconsistent with the aims, objectives and principles of the Party"?
  3. If you were Stephen Phillips, Secretary of the Board of the Conservative Party, would your answer be any different?

Please free to give your answer below in a comment.

I will say which answer I like the most and it may or may not help you in your bid to become Chairman.   

Should Peter Mandelson present The Andrew Marr Show?

I anticipate the usual objections about his well-established pro-EU stance offending against journalistic impartiality.  However, it could be tempered by my presence in the show, for I have always been Eurosceptic and had a reputation for impartiality.

Even Nick Griffin acknowledged this after reading http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2008/06/interview-with-nick-griffin-may-2004.html

So, while The Andrew Marr Show becomes The Peter Mandelson Show if Peter were to present it, it would become The Lord and Lady Mandelson Politics Show if we were both to co-host it and he to marry me.

I don't think people have any idea how entertaining and charming I can be if I put my mind to it.  

There will doubtless be the usual objections about my alleged "extremism", but the list of parties I have joined is testament to my determination to remain non-partisan and to leave my spoors in every party.   Even now, I exhort the political parties to merge into one party for the sake of the long-term national interest.

I have been a member of the following:

  1. The Conservative Party
  2. UKIP
  3. The Labour Party
  4. The BNP


It does seem that, taken together, I would be more impartial than Peter, who has only ever been a member of the Labour Party.

Indeed, my political experience may be wider than his in some or perhaps many regards.

The idea of having one's national laws subordinate to a supranational entity is something I found, as a nationalist,  instinctively abhorrent.

I was actively Eurosceptic as long ago as the Maastricht Bill, in fact.  Bill Cash and his other volunteers others I worked with then should remember me.

I could be the Stacey Herbert to Peter's Max Keiser, perhaps.  At any rate, I am sure Peter and I can work as a team, if not a couple.

Ah, to think of Peter and me, the Juan and Eva Peron of British politics!  

Lord and Lady Mandelson to debate the EU on The Lord and Lady Mandelson Politics Show?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/12/ken-clarke-peter-mandelson-eurosceptics

I think an EU Special should be planned and a pilot episode of The Lord and Lady Mandelson Politics Show broadcast sometime soon.

We will have a debating society format.  The nation can vote by SMS on what they want to do: stay in or go out.

Sorted.


Enslaving immigrants would give the British a source of cheap labour

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/370832

ANGER AS DAVID CAMERON BACKS BLACKOUT OVER MIGRANT FLOOD FEAR

DAVID Cameron yesterday gave his support to a blackout on revealing how many Romanian and Bulgarian migrants could flood into Britain next year.

My solution is simple:


"I see no harm in introducing a form of slavery with those who don't have the right papers and aren't British citizens. After five years they are free to go. They can re-enslave themselves for a further five years and thereafter become British citizens. It would solve the Labour shortage ... Then everyone would be happy."

Wednesday, 16 January 2013

The brilliant screenplay to HITLER - THE MOVIE ignored in our PC world

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Young-Hitler-Claus-Hant/dp/0704371820


I noticed today that Naim Attallah with whom I had lunch this time two years ago was complaining that the critics had completely ignored Claus Hant's "non-fiction novel" entitled YOUNG HITLER

Naim Attallah at Le Boudin Blanc where we had lunch in January 2011
http://www.boudinblanc.co.uk/

Naim tweeted:

https://twitter.com/nattallah/status/290910057649033216"For those who follow my blog read my article tomorrow about " Young Hitler" a book Quartet published in 2010. It was ignored then ."


https://twitter.com/nattallah/status/290911532840263680"Why was "Young Hitler "ignored? Although on the face of it the reason is obscure, the reality is different . It is thought provoking......"

https://twitter.com/nattallah/status/291451642807742464Diana Mosley http://wp.me/pGlMo-ET 

It is terribly sad that the liberal establishment and media are conspiring to ignore this book which is both entertaining and profound.   My review is at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/book-on-which-hitler-movie-will-be.html

Here is what I suggest Quartet Books do for maximum publicity:

Announce that forthcoming issues of The Literary Review and The Oldie will contain reviews of Young Hitler by


  1. the current Lord Chief Rabbi
  2. the former Lord Chief Rabbi
  3. the Neturei Karta Rabbi
  4. the current Archbishop of Canterbury
  5. the former Archbishop of Canterbury
  6. Abdal Hakim Murad
  7. Anjem Choudary
  8. David Irving who will I hope one day become Lord Irving of Nazism in the same way Kenneth Clark  became Lord Clark of Civilisation
  9. the PM or anyone he nominates
  10. the Deputy PM or anyone he nominates
  11. the Leader of the Opposition or anyone he nominates
  12. the leader of UKIP
  13. the leader of the BNP

who would all be sent review copies.

It would not surprise me at all if many of the above would shrink from this undertaking, but out of this lot I really think Naim can at least squeeze at least a review or three out of this list.  

It does not all have to be published in one issue, though it would be nice to have an Adolf Hitler Special  issue of both the Literary Review and the Oldie, which would no doubt increase their respective circulations dramatically, if the publicity is managed properly, by me, perhaps.  

It is possible that the editrix of the Literary Review Nancy Sladek might baulk at this idea, but I would like to think that Richard Ingrams of the Oldie would still be game for a laugh.  In my experience, it is not the elderly but the young who have a fit of the vapours whenever they see a swastika.  The old should always retain the capacity to shock the young, and the idea of the Oldie doing a Nazi Special is too delicious for words.

Lord Mandelson spotted by Claire Khaw's friend in Westminster looking grim and purposeful


This was what I was told while she was ringing me about something else, yesterday evening.


Me and Mandy  - are we moving towards ever-closer union?



Would the British people enjoy a politics show called The Lord and Lady Mandelson Politics Show on Sundays around the same time as The Andrew Marr Show?

Would the level of political discourse be raised as a result of Peter and me co-hosting this show?

Will we be the Punch and Judy of politics shows?

Or the Richard and Judy?

I have consulted our horoscopes and they are auspicious.  Scorpio men cannot resist me.

The men who have truly loved me or been tolerably fond of me have been scorpio men.

All the men I have ever loved were scorpio men.

Come up and see me sometime, Peter.

Just for you, I will even join the Labour Party again, if they will have me.

I am actually OK about the aims, objects and values of the Labour Party.  


Clause IV.
Aims and values 
1. The Labour Party is a democratic socialist party. It 
believes that by the strength of our common 
endeavour we achieve more than we achieve 
alone, so as to create for each of us the means to 
realise our true potential and for all of us a 
community in which power, wealth and 
opportunity are in the hands of the many not the 
few; where the rights we enjoy reflect the duties 
we owe and where we live together freely, in a 
spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect. 
2. To these ends we work for:  
A. A DYNAMIC ECONOMY, serving the public 
interest, in which the enterprise of the market 
and the rigour of competition are joined with 
the forces of partnership and co-operation to 
produce the wealth the nation needs and the 
opportunity for all to work and prosper with a 
thriving private sector and high-quality public 
services where those undertakings essential 
to the common good are either owned by the 
public or accountable to them 
B. A JUST SOCIETY, which judges its strength by 
the condition of the weak as much as the 
strong, provides security against fear, and 
justice at work; which nurtures families, 
promotes equality of opportunity, and delivers 
people from the tyranny of poverty, prejudice 
and the abuse of power 
C. AN OPEN DEMOCRACY, in which government 
is held to account by the people, decisions are 
taken as far as practicable by the communities 
they affect and where fundamental human 
rights are guaranteed 
D. A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT, which we protect, 
enhance and hold in trust for future 
generations. 
3. Labour is committed to the defence and security 
of the British people and to co-operating in 
European institutions, the United Nations, the 
Commonwealth and other international bodies to 
secure peace, freedom, democracy, economic 
security and environmental protection for all. 
4. Labour shall work in pursuit of these aims with 
trade unions and co-operative societies and also 
with voluntary organisations, consumer groups 
and other representative bodies. 
5. On the basis of these principles, Labour seeks the 
trust of the people to govern. 

Please don't anyone joke about me joining the LibDems, for I cannot support the nonsense at http://www.libdems.org.uk/constitution.aspx as it would be against my principles.   

As for the aims, objects and values of the Conservative Party, I am still waiting for Stephen Phillips, the Secretary of the Board of the Conservative Party who cancelled my membership on 20 December 2012, to tell me what they are at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/my-open-letter-to-conservative-party.html for it seems I have said and done something that is "wholly inconsistent with the aims, objectives and principles of the Conservative Party".  

I must say I was a bit taken aback to be told that the Conservative Party had any principles at all, and am agog to know what they might be.  


http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/the-lord-and-lady-mandelson-show-to.html

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/should-peter-mandelson-present-andrew.html

The purpose of morality

The purpose of morality is to:


  1. maintain social cohesion by making us nicer to each other than we otherwise might be
  2. maintain our knowledge, status and wealth so that we do not become degenerate and our society, nation and civilisation weaken
  3. implement eugenics (in the sense of maintaining or improving the quality of the next generation)

It is quite idiotic not to consider sexual morality as irrelevant since it clearly is.   

The reason why we should not commit incest is pretty obvious too, even if it is between consenting adults.   

Therefore there must be good reasons why extramarital sex is prohibited.  The reason is of course to prevent degeneracy.  

What is degeneracy?   

It is being inferior to your parents and ancestors in status, wealth, intellect, education and physique.  

What are we now but hopelessly degenerate?

What have we been doing but indulge in an orgy of extramarital sex for the past 50 years leading to widespread illegitimacy, national degeneracy and civilisational decline?

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2011/05/shock-horror-britons-getting-5-more.html
British getting 5% stupider every year

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/in-what-year-will-britain-be-100.html
In what year will the British be 100% learning disabled if the number of learning disabled people increase by 5% each year?



IDIOT SIGHTING No.1

My daughter and I went to the McDonald's drive through check-out window to pay our bill and I gave
the clerk a £5 note.

Our total bill was £4.20, so I also handed her a 20 pence piece.

She said, 'You gave me too much money.'

I said, 'Yes I know, but this way you can just give me £1 back.'

She sighed and went to get the Manager who asked me to repeat my request.

I did so, and he handed me back the 20 pence and said 'We're sorry but we do not do that kind of thing.'

The clerk then proceeded to give me back 80 pence in change.

Do not confuse the clerks at MacDonald's !!


IDIOT SIGHTING No2

We had to have the garage door repaired. The GARADOR repairman told us

that one of our problems was that we did not have a 'large' enough motor on the opener.

I thought for a moment, and said that we had the largest one GARADOR made at that time, a 1/2 horsepower.

He shook his head and said, 'Lady, you need a 1/4 horsepower.'

I responded that 1/2 was larger than 1/4 and he said, 'NOOO, it's not. Four is larger than two..'

We haven't used Garador repair since. Happened in Moor Park , near Watford .



IDIOT SIGHTING No3

I live in a semi-rural area. We recently had a new neighbour call the

Highways Department to request the removal of the 'DEER CROSSING' sign

from our road.

The reason: 'Too many deer are being hit by cars on this stretch of road! I don't

think this is a good place for them to be crossing, any-more.'


Story from Potters Bar, Hertfordshire.



IDIOT SIGHTING No 4

My daughter went to a local Kentucky Fried Chicken and ordered a Taco. She asked the person behind the counter for 'minimal lettuce.'

He said he was sorry, but they only had Iceberg Lettuce.


From South Oxhey , Hertfordshire.



IDIOT SIGHTING No 5

I was at the airport, checking in at the gate when an airport employee asked,

'Has anyone put anything in your baggage without your knowledge?'

To which I replied, 'If it was without my knowledge, how would I know?'

He smiled knowingly and nodded, 'That's why we ask.'



Happened at Luton Airport UK



IDIOT SIGHTING No 6

The traffic light on the corner buzzes when the lights turn red and it is safe to cross the road.

I was crossing with an intellectually challenged friend of mine.

She asked if I knew what the buzzer was for.

I explained that it signals blind people when the light is red.

Appalled, she responded, 'What on earth are blind people doing driving?!'

She is a Local County Council employee in Harrow , Middlesex. UK (And she's NOT blonde)





IDIOT SIGHTING No7

When my husband and I arrived at our local Ford dealer to pick up our car,

we were told the keys had been locked in it.

We went to the Service Department and found a mechanic working feverishly to unlock the Driver's door.

As I watched from the passenger side, I instinctively tried the door-handle and discovered that it was unlocked.

'Hey,' I announced to the Fitter/Mechanic, 'it’s open!'

His reply: 'I know. I already did that side.'

This was at the Ford dealership in St Albans , Hertfordshire UK





STAY ALERT! They walk among us. AND THEY BREED!

Tuesday, 15 January 2013

Saatchi Gallery on 3 January 2013

GAIETY IS THE MOST OUTSTANDING
FEATURE OF THE SOVIET UNION

21 NOV 2012 - 5 MAY 2013
















HONG KONG EYE 2012

5 December 2012 - 12 January 2013




Jeffrey Marshall inside wooden tank which special footage of exhibits and sound effects.  You can pretend you are going round the gallery blasting exhibits you dislike.  














BREAKING THE ICE: MOSCOW ART, 1960-80s

21 Nov 2012 - 24 Feb 2013









David Irving make a TV documentary on Nazism and become Lord Irving of Nazism

http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/13/01/Hess_mtg_pics.html

I finally bought an Irving book - the Hess one, because it didn't look too long.  It reads like a novel.   https://irvingbooks.com/xcart/product.php?productid=17525&cat=3&page=1

Me and perhaps the man who will one day become Lord Irving of Nazism ...

That is the particular speciality of David Irving. It is not so much his views, but the way he tells the story.

In any case, I do not think anyone Jewish present would be made uncomfortable by anything that was said. I am sure there must be Jews interested in real Nazi history and not merely the hysterical liberal version.  The only person who was obviously antisemitic was Lady Renouf, who was complaining about having been blacklisted by agencies so she can no longer get any work, after her visit to Iran.   However, to me, she was as beautiful and charming as ever.   In a way it is almost a kind of comic book antisemitism that I like to think I would not feel threatened by, even if I were myself a Jew.

I think Mr Irving really should record his talks and put them online as a taster, just to convey a flavour of his talks.

The Hess one I found the most moving, Hess to whom Mr Irving would have awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, but who was instead prosecuted for Crimes Against Peace, when it was he who risked life and limb to prevent a European Holocaust ...

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/nomination/#nominators

I would quite like the Nobel Peace Prize too and http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/how-to-solve-problem-of-israel.html is my suggestion for bringing about peace to the Middle East.

If Obama can be awarded it when he goes around invading so many countries, then why not me?

I enjoyed the Jimmy Savile joke too, made during the talk by Hugo Haig-Thomas.

Mr Irving is an English gentleman of the Old School.   In terms of television historians, I think he could be the equivalent of Lord Clark of Civilisation.  Sadly, however, Mr Irving is the kind of English gentleman who is rapidly becoming extinct.   Our degenerate times can no longer produce men of his quality, I fear.   If it were in my power, I would make him Lord Irving of Nazism.   It would be simply wonderful if a BBC camera crew could help him bring these characters back to life by following him around Germany and around the Munich beer houses in which Hitler made his speeches ...

It was very sociable with a lot of people I knew but didn't quite get the chance to speak to before they all went their separate ways again. A most enjoyable evening.  Everyone was so nice and friendly too.   

My review of Mein Kampf at Amazon


http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/817224164X/ref=cm_cr_pr_btm_link_1?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=0


I found Mein Kampf informative and entertaining though it must be pointed out that Hitler conflates Jews with liberals and liberalism.

Jews, by dint of following their religion, practising their traditions and respecting the institutions of marriage and family, will find themselves effortlessly superior to the gentiles who do not.

While I do not agree with him about his racial theories, all that he says about government, democracy, the stupidity of the general public, liberals and the cowardice and hypocrisy of the middle classes remains disturbingly true.

His racial theories are clearly nonsensical since, if there were a race that was inherently superior to all other races then that race would stay top dog for all time.

That "every dog will have his day" is clearly closer to reality.

It is of course perfectly possible to argue that the Jews secretly or not so secretly consider themselves to be a superior race. They were after all the people who created God.

It could even be said that Jews are the teacher's pet in a world of dunces and bullies.

My theory is that the problem of antisemitism, endemic in Christian Europe, is actually a problem of Christianity, which is as a faith inferior to both Judaism and Islam. Christianity is inferior to Judaism and Islam because you have to ignore so much of it to make it work. I believe Hitler even thought that himself, but knew it would not be politic to point this out to the Germans of his time.

It occurs to me that if Hitler had really been serious about the Germans acquiring racial superiority, then he should have converted the Germans to Judaism, instead of just planning to get rid of the competition by shipping them to Madagascar minus their property.

Racial superiority is rather like claiming to be a lady or gentleman. The more you insist that you are a lady or a gentleman, the less likely you are to be either.

A truly superior person would never dream of claiming to be superior.


Get the John Murphy translation.