Translate

Friday, 28 June 2013

Conservative lawyers should prepare themselves for a competition to draft the principles of the Conservative Party

While I do not wish to be guilty of counting my chickens before the eggs are hatched, perhaps it is no bad thing to visualise the success of my application to seek permission to apply for judicial review against the Conservative Party's irrational and improper decision to expel me for behaving in a way that was claimed to by the Secretary of the Board of the Conservative Party to be "wholly inconsistent with its aims, values and principles" while


  1. refusing to tell me what they are;
  2. being unable to tell me what they are;
  3. apparently claiming that the puffery contained in David Cameron's Foreword in their 2010 General Election Manifesto amounts to a Statement of Principles, let alone Conservative Party principles;
  4. being unable to show me in any way at all how my behaviour or beliefs were contrary to the principles of the Conservative Party, whatever they are.

God, if He exists, would surely approve of what I am trying to do, get Conservatives to declare what exactly it is that they stand for.   

God, if He exists, would disapprove deeply of any nation in which gay marriage is legal.  His disapproval might reach Sodom and Gomorrah levels, who knows, and we are not that far away from a still active volcano in Iceland.   

God, if He exists, would be horror-stricken and incandescent that such a morally offensive proposal should come from a male Conservative Prime Minister, of all people.   

In the light of such indecently liberal interpretations of what Conservative Party principles might be, I think it would be just easier of we made the Koran a baseline for Conservative values simply because the punishments are a lot less harsh than the punishments in the Old Testament.  The Church of England used to be known as the Conservative Party at prayer.  Now, however, the Church of England is liberals not at prayer condoning if not actually encouraging extramarital sex.   

Applying the Goldilocks principle described at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldilocks_principle therefore, the Koran would be the happy medium.   

Clearly, the difficulty in practising Conservative values is because they have never been properly defined.  Because no one knows what they are, no one knows when they are being strayed from.  

It is therefore easier to point to a book that is considered morally authoritative that also contains hang 'em, flog 'em principles so beloved of Conservatives of the old school.

Direct democracy ie government by referendum would tend to give expression to the will of the people.  This would come under the Koranic principle of Shura.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shura

A 20% flat rate income tax would be welcome to many hard-pressed businessmen choked by red tape told that tax avoidance is now considered by an increasingly corrupt and irrational government to be  the same as tax evasion.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khums

What possible objection can men and women have to giving men the option of having up to four wives?

Or to lashing SSMs 100 times in public to discourage women from being sluts and becoming single mothers who are a burden on the state?

Only the feminists and liberals would object.  But then they would, wouldn't they?

The point is that they are not Conservative and none of their silly ideas should be taken seriously by a properly-run Conservative government with proper Conservative principles.  

Slogans against the matriarchy

Thursday, 27 June 2013

The Queen on the Application of Claire Khaw versus The Conservative Party

HM Courts &b Tribunals Service
26 June 2013


Dear Madam

Re  The Queen on the application of CLAIRE KHAW versus the CONSERVATIVE PARTY


Your claim for judicial review has been issued this day.

You will need to serve all documents on the Defendant.  Please note that serve must be effected within 7 days of the date of this letter, and a Certificate of Service lodged with the Court.  Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the file in these proceedings being closed.  

When serving the claim on the Defendant, please ensure you enclose a copy of attached notice.


Please also note our Case Reference number should  be quoted whenever you communicate with the Court. 
Your attention is drawn to Part 54 of the Civil Procedure Rules and its accompanying Practice Directions, which give guidance on future procedural matters.

Yours faithfully
Court Manager


Guess what I omitted to to do yesterday?    [Kicks self hard.]  Now I have to put it into an envelope and put a stamp on it.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=481801485227823&set=a.481801175227854.1073741836.100001939264017&type=1&theater

Sunday, 23 June 2013

What are the beliefs of the British?

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/405188/BANNED-British-shopkeeper-forced-to-stop-selling-obey-our-laws-or-get-out-T-shirt



I think anyone wearing a top like that should be asked to explain what British beliefs are for one whole hour, especially if they are EDL or BNP on a special BBC programme devoted to the concerns of nationalists and what they think their beliefs are, with Muslims in the audience. That should be punishment enough.

Rookh Kshatriya Do 'our beliefs' include staggering the streets in a drunken stupor on a Friday night, or girl-children dressing like 10 dollar whores, or attacking sovereign states to steal their oil? We need to be told.

Saturday, 22 June 2013

Should MCSF and SPOSSM bachelors be treated as second class citizens?

If the franchise were restricted only to men, should bachelors be disenfranchised to get a better class of voter?

We have discovered that it is men who say they don't want to get married and never want to have children who do not want their access to online porn restricted.

We have discovered that it is men who say they don't want to get married and never want to have children who are most vociferous and hypocritical in condemning me for proposing to legalise infanticide if it is committed by the parents of the unwanted disabled unviable infant.

We have discovered that it is men who say they don't want to get married and never want to have children  who refuse to condemn SSMs https://www.facebook.com/pages/Are-Spinster-Single-Mums-a-burden-on-the-state/417696111659379, because they want their source of sex to stay cheap.  Otherwise, they would have to take a wife or pay a prostitute.

Clearly, indiscriminate universal suffrage has been a terrible mistake.

These unmarried men are MCSFs and they constitute the majority of men these days.

Left to themselves these MCSFs would protect SSMs and sluts forever more while filling their time between slut-fucking with masturbating to porn. They will never marry or have children. These men are actually useless as well as immoral.

I am surprised that the BNP (who ought to be concerned about the degeneracy of the white race, you would have thought) do not see this obvious cause of social problems.

Or perhaps they do, but do not wish to alienate the majority of their members who are overwhelmingly MCSFs.

All SPOSSMs are MCSFs but not all MCSFs are SPOSSMs.

SPOSSM - Sex Partner of SSM

MCSF - Morally-Compromised Slut-Fucker

Most voters in Britain are sluts, SSMs or MCSFs.

People deserve the government they get.

After all, you wouldn't expect a nation of sluts, SSMs and MCSFs to deserve good government, would you?

Such people would only deserve a political establishment with the morals of a stupid slut and the behaviour of a bastard.

Feminised men's rights activists cannot discuss difficult questions and resort to censorship by removing me from their group

We know who is in power by those whom we cannot criticise, and we can no longer criticise the promiscuous and stupid woman.
Do I take it that most men here are not interested in getting married even if fault were reintroduced into divorce and even if their taxes were cut so that a single male income can support a family?
How long have the British been desecrating marriage?
Like ·  · Unfollow Post · 56 minutes ago near London
Do you agree that we live in a matriarchy?
Like ·  · Unfollow Post · 57 minutes ago near London
Would you have taken the caution if you had been Charles Saatchi?
Like ·  · Unfollow Post · about an hour ago near London
The woman from Del Monte says NO.

Overbalanced coverage of women's matches in the BBC coverage of the Eastbourne tennis tournament.
Is it my imagination, or where are the men's matches?
The women's matches mostly have been displays of fairly weak tennis, with matches often very one-sided, and players unable to produce any sort of consistency.
This contrasts markedly with the competitive standard of the men's matches.
This bias by the BBC is surely part of its risible attempt to pretend that women are just as sports competitive as are men -- hence screening non-popular women's football and golf recently..
At least there wasn't the additional sexism in this tournament of women needing only two sets to the men's three, to then get similar prize money despite also producing a far lower standard of tennis, which is also less popular.
Like ·  · Unfollow Post · about an hour ago
  • Seen by 13
  • Mike Buchanan Steve, in a similar vein, in today's Daily Mail (p35) there's an article by Jane Fryer titled, 'Never Mind Andy Murray - it's the ball girls who REALLY go through hell to star at Wimbledon'. 

    Best wishes,

    Mike Buchanan
    ...See More
    about an hour ago via  · Like
  • Claire Khaw Men should not even attempt to beat women in the pursuit of victimhood status, IMHO. It just looks effeminate, disgusting and pathetic. Instead, ruthlessly undermine their arguments (which is very easy to do) and do not relent even when they start boo-hooing.
Do I take it that most men here are atheists and do not intend to either marry or have legitimate children?
Like ·  · Unfollow Post · 3 hours ago near London
"We must with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion."
Agree
  • Claire Khaw
Disagree


    Like ·  · Unfollow Post · 3 hours ago
    • Seen by 17
    • John Mac Canna Religion is anti morality. It corrupts and poisons everything. It is hypocritical, greedy, violent, a corruption, it is born of fear ignorance, promoted by the powerful, it cheats and lies. NOW IT IS weak they have to be nice, but lived in a time place Ireland 1970s when they were strong and they were very nasty. I do not like religion.
      2 hours ago · Edited · Like · 1
    • Martin Brady The irony is that many of the censorship measures which the radfems are trying to demand were in place in pre-Mary Robinson Ireland, and that country was hardly a bastion of women's rights!
    People deserve the government they get. The British deserve the government they get. People who are mostly sexually immoral should expect to be governed by a government that has no moral principles.
    Agree
    Disagree


    Like ·  · Unfollow Post · 3 hours ago
    To overthrow the matriarchy, you must be prepared to challenge feminism and say so in no uncertain terms. You must be prepared to say the F word.
    Agree
    Disagree


      Like ·  · Unfollow Post · 3 hours ago
      • Seen by 18
      • Martin Brady "The patriarchy isn't how the feminists present it, but it is technically, by definition there."

        I think you're getting that back-to-front, Owen Eastwood: 'patriarchy' is an ideological construct, with roots in Marxism-Leninism.
      • Martin Brady "A patriarchy is a society that condones male promiscuity, and a matriarchy one that condones female promiscuity."

        Those are only YOUR personal definitions: the more widely accepted (and yet, still highly contentious) definitions of those terms are more complex.
        3 hours ago · Like · 2
      To ask for men's rights is the wrong way to go about it because this suggests you are applying to the matriarchy for rights, and are therefore in the position of a supplicant. This is a disgraceful and contemptible position, if you are a man.
      Agree
      • Claire Khaw
      Disagree


        Like ·  · Unfollow Post · 3 hours ago
        • Seen by 18
        • Claire Khaw The problem is the same here with UK political parties - one of leadership.
        • Steve Wylie ADMIN: Look, Claire - dial it back a bit will you? Take time to scroll through some of the threads of this group and see what are priorities are, before joining in appropriately. We don't do binary voting questions, and we keep politics to a minimum - if at all.

          Thank you for your co-operation.
          3 hours ago · Like · 2
        To overthrow the matriarchy, you will have to get either UKIP or BNP to promote an anti-feminist and pro-marriage message. To overthrow the matriarchy, all you have to do is call for the repeal of the Equality Act 2010 and the reintroduction of fault into divorce.
        Agree
        • Claire Khaw
        Disagree


          Like ·  · Unfollow Post · 3 hours ago