Why not change name of the Samuel Johnson Prize to "The Samuela Johnson Non-Fiction Prize of Feminine Angst"?

http://www.thesamueljohnsonprize.co.uk/node/347

Judges for the 2014 Samuel Johnson Prize:

1. Claire Tomalin - female
2. Alan Johnson - Labour MP (Did he even read the book?)
3. Lorien Kite - name of young man with the name of a girl
4. Ray Monk - lefty academic who complained of Terry Eagleton being "reactionary" because he dared to criticise Guardian journalists with bad grammar https://twitter.com/Raymodraco/status/520941288150302721
5. Ruth Scurr - her interests include "early feminist political thought" now divorced from her husband John Dunn who says very very interesting things about the state of our democracy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34_b5dY3HSw  His book The Cunning of Unreason is reviewed at http://www.theguardian.com/media/2000/aug/27/mondaymediasection.pressandpublishing  Perhaps that should have been awarded the Samuel Johnson Prize?

In short, you have to be female and/or libtard to be a judge.

Are the Samuel Johnson Prize judges libtards, feminazis and manginas? If so, how can it retain its literary and intellectual integrity?

@BBCr4today However much one loves one's father, Helen Macdonald's book still sounds dreadfully dull. What *man* is going to read it?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@BBCr4today One wonders if there is not some sort of female tokenism in giving the Samuel Johnson Prize to Helen Macdonald not unattractive.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@BBCr4today One wonders how quickly Samuel Johnson is spinning in his grave now at Helen Macdonald being awarded a prize bearing his name.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

So the previous Samuel Johnson Prize was also awarded to a woman? http://t.co/PA7u2S5843 @BBCr4today
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@robbiecowen Samuel Johnson Prize judges women and lefty men. http://t.co/zPHR5bXgl1 Sounds dreadfully dull.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@loubgray @HelenJMacdonald @BBCRadio4 Should I suggest to David Irving that he enter one of his books for @SJPrize in 2015? @IrvingBooks
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@loubgray @HelenJMacdonald I have a feeling that Samuel Johnson himself would rather @SJPrize go to David Irving. @IrvingBooks
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@loubgray @SJPrize @HelenJMacdonald How wd Samuel Johnson feel about a prize in his name going to a bird moaning about her dad thru a bird?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@loubgray @SJPrize @HelenJMacdonald @BBCRadio4 Let us bear in mind that Samuel Johnson was a Conservative and a Traditional Anglican.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@loubgray @SJPrize @HelenJMacdonald @BBCRadio4 Let us bear in mind that Samuel Johnson would probably not have thought much of women writers
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@loubgray @SJPrize @HelenJMacdonald @BBCRadio4 If there were a Claire Khaw Prize I would hate it being awarded to feminazis and libtards.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@Raymodraco Would Samuel Johnson himself have approved of a prize bearing his name being given to a bird moaning about her dad thru a bird?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@Raymodraco @guardian Is it time for David Irving to enter one of his books for next year's @SJPrize? @IrvingBooks
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@Raymodraco @guardian Next time I see David Irving I shall suggest he enter one of his books for the @SJPrize next year.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@kenanmalik It is high time David Irving entered one of his books for @SJPrize. He should certainly do so next year. @IrvingBooks
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@Booktimemag @HelenJMacdonald Why not change name of Samuel Johnson Prize to "Non-Fiction Prize for Female Preoccupations"? @Raymodraco
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@M_Z_Harrison Why? What's your interest in this?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@sarahditum @M_Z_Harrison I feel sure Samuel Johnson would have found a bird moaning about her dad through a bird dreadfully dull.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@CaroleRichmond @M_Z_Harrison Could it be said the matriarchy has now more or less completed its colonisation of all spheres of public life?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@finkowska @M_Z_Harrison @sarahditum It really sounds dreadfully dull and one must wonder if Samuel Johnson himself would have approved.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@FestivalofIdeas @HelenJMacdonald @JonathanCape Last year the Samuel Johnson Prize was given to a woman too.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum You have no interest in discussing how feminine preoccupations absolutely permeate public life?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum I am sure H Is For Hawk will become a GCSE set book and boys forced to read it. @MikeBuchanan11
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum I can imagine boys forced 2 read H Is For Hawk will be put off reading for the rest of their lives
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum I can see @HelenMacdonald is not unattractive. What do you think, @Raymodraco?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum When boys forced to read girly books hate it do badly in EngLit they will be told they r useless.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum One has to ask: have men stopped writing non-fiction these 2 years or have they just given up?
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum Just saying that lefty/libtard/feminists have taken over all literary prizes in the UK.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@finkowska Libtard not prepared 2 discuss whether Samuel Johnson wd hv approved of feminisation of literature in his name? What surprise.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum I know not one of u will discuss it and this is your way of dealing with questions and criticisms.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum I know @Finkowska is yet anr who considers it appropriate to dismiss challenges with one word: BYE
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum Do u sometimes wonder y terrorism is committed? Cos of attitudes of people like u and @finkowska
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@finkowska @M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum A troll: someone with views libtards dislike with questions they can't answer.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@finkowska @M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum Just collecting evidence of dismissive attitudes of libtards who won't answer questions
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@finkowska @M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum Just collecting evidence of arrogant attitudes of libtards who control the media.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@finkowska @M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum Just collecting evidence of libtards smearing ppl who ask questions they can't answer.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@finkowska @M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum I already know no answer is in a way of kind of answer.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@finkowska @M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum A stated refusal to answer or deal with one's arguments is also information n evidence.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@finkowska @M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum One has to go thru motions of asking nicely, then asking again, before upping ante.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@finkowska @M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum I see you have retweeted my tweet mentioning terrorism at https://t.co/NrG2pdP3JC Good.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

@finkowska @M_Z_Harrison @CaroleRichmond @sarahditum I also hope some excitable hysterical malicious feminazi will call the cops too.
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2014

You can read an extract of this dreadfully dull sounding book at http://www.amazon.co.uk/H-Hawk-Helen-Macdonald/dp/0224097008 Reading it  confirmed my opinion of the endemic corruption of British institutions and literary standards, which seems to be to cultivate failure and promote mediocrity.

I wonder how many copies of this deadly dull book will sell and if sold be finished by the reader. I was already bored senseless by the time I finished the extract, and it seems to be "Moan, whinge, bird, dad, feathers, nest, blah blah  and blah ... "

You may have a more rewarding read at http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/index.html