The referendum result must be respected. Leave means Leave: out of the single market. #Brexit pic.twitter.com/vXrbj6oAKj— Nigel Farage (@Nigel_Farage) November 6, 2016
"Judges should be subject to some sort of democratic control" says @SuzanneEvans1 on Brexit ruling https://t.co/evUkY8PvF4 pic.twitter.com/sMDrqmwvVD— BBC Radio 4 Today (@BBCr4today) November 7, 2016
The best way of dealing with High Court decision to thwart the result of the plebiscite is require that any judge hearing this application for judicial review on the triggering of Article 50 declare how he voted in the EU Referendum and swear to tell the truth. If it is subsequently discovered that he lied, he should be hanged from the nearest lamp post.
If he voted remain, then that judge should be disqualified from hearing this application on the grounds that no one should be a judge in his own cause, or, nemo judex in causa sua, if you prefer Latin.
This should sort out how the appeal to the Supreme Court should be handled to get the result we want.
If no Supreme Court judge can be found who voted leave - which is perfectly possible knowing how libtard the judiciary is - then the whole application should be struck out.
In fact, the application should have been struck out ab initio for being totally without merit.
The First Claimant Gina Miller has no locus standi for one thing because she does not represent the majority of the voters who voted to leave. It would be outrageous that this woman - who was not even British-born - should have the right to thwart the will of 17M voters by merely application by requiring that MPs vote to trigger Article 50 when she did not even vote leave.
The Second Claimant is the First Claimant's Portuguese hairdresser and is not even a British National.
No one who is not a British national has the locus standi to make this application.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3903436/Enemies-people-Fury-touch-judges-defied-17-4m-Brexit-voters-trigger-constitutional-crisis.html
If some bitch and her hairdresser can stop what 17,410,742 voted for, then people would want to change this "rule of law", wouldn't they?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2016
I hope the 17,410,742 who voted to leave the EU are not going to any crap from some bitch and her hairdresser lying down.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2016
Are the men who voted to leave the EU going to take crap from some jumped up bitch and her hairdresser lying down when Brexit is thwarted?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2016
@elliott_wess I just can't believe that some fucking bitch born in Guyana and her fucking hairdresser has prevented Brexit.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2016
@elliott_wess If the House - stuffed to its rafters with libtard Europhiles - votes on it we will never leave.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2016
Are UKIP capable of organising n armed insurrection to avenge the humiliation of having Brexit thwarted by a rich bitch and her hairdresser? https://t.co/SorhA3imCV— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2016
Will anyone organise an armed insurrection to avenge the national humiliation of having Brexit thwarted by a rich bitch and her hairdresser? https://t.co/exslbBfZJc— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2016
If Article 50 has to be triggered by the House then it will *never* be triggered by those fucking libtard Europhiliacs laughing at us.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 5, 2016
@Livlonanprsper @Bonn1eGreer @Breitbart @BreitbartLondon @HuffingtonPost If the majority vote for the "Far Right", you'll cancel democracy?— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@DavidTonge2 @thatginamiller Brexiteers know the judiciary is libtard.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@Big_Bebbo1 @thatginamiller Humiliating indeed for Englishmen to have their plebiscite thwarted by a foreign-born woman and her hairdresser.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@washsquare @thatginamiller If Englishmen take this fucking shit lying down, then they deserve all that's coming to them.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@SLevelt @thatginamiller Parliamentary democracy was fucking shit, that's why we had a plebiscite. Now we're told to take more shit.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@champagne_lefty There are more of us than there are Europhiliac libtards and feminazis.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@KatakusM @thatginamiller Women love the EU because EU government is Big Sister Government.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@AmandaB131567 @thatginamiller Middle class graduate females love the EU and despise the working man whom they enjoy humiliating.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@SamaelMorres @thatginamiller Oh, she'll just fuck off back to Guyana or wherever she owns property while MPs are torn limb from limb ...— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@SamaelMorres It is just possible that @thatginamiller will regret her act of hubris.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @EUtopean @thatginamiller We didn't vote for rule by libtards, we voted to leave. Keep fucking with us and see what happens.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @EUtopean @thatginamiller We voted to leave the EU and cannot but help notice that libtard judiciary is seeking to thwart us.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@sparklespencer @guardian Liberals don't stand for anything and make the rules up as they go along. They certainly don't stand for liberty.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@mearlwilliams @inkelectric To be fair, the decision could have gone either way, but because the judiciary is libtard, it went that way.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@mearlwilliams @inkelectric Judges must be required to state how they voted in referendum and disqualified from sitting if they voted remain— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@elliott_wess Yes. Gina Miller is probably waiting to collect enough threats so she can report them all to the police and put them in jail.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@elliott_wess The tactic of the feminazi: provoke hatred and abuse and then prosecute, convict and jail the people you have provoked.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@VeryAngryHobbit @RaheemKassam The BBC is libtard, like the judiciary, academia and both Houses of Parliament.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
Perhaps @theresa_may should just declare a state of emergency under a national government and appoint me her adviser https://t.co/dQV1fIzVM3 https://t.co/Q1G2QiAZFl— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BostonManorRoad @BlackXList @EUtopean @thatginamiller Then voters who wanted to leave shd hv proceeded 2 revolution omitting the plebiscite— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@ReeceColeman4 @eagle252525 @TheNewEuropean @campbellclaret Nationalism is the most natural form of government for any nation.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@ReeceColeman4 @eagle252525 @TheNewEuropean @campbellclaret Destruction of national identity/sovereignty clearly not the national interest.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@ReeceColeman4 @eagle252525 @TheNewEuropean @campbellclaret The enemies of the people want to destroy the nation.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@ReeceColeman4 @eagle252525 @TheNewEuropean @campbellclaret The people make up the nation. The EU is destructive of national sovereignty.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BostonManorRoad @BlackXList The judgement says the Eurosceptic plebiscite has to be approved of by a Europhiliac Parliament.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BostonManorRoad @BlackXList The reason why people wanted a plebiscite was because they knew the Europhiliac Parliament would never leave.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@ReeceColeman4 @eagle252525 @TheNewEuropean @campbellclaret Those who voted 2 leave wanted 2 leave. Judiciary says not if Parliament says no— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @Predicati0n @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean I have already predicted, along with Nigel Farage, violence if the people are thwarted.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@ReeceColeman4 @eagle252525 @TheNewEuropean @campbellclaret This sovereignty you refer to is libtard hegemony of the political establishment— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@ReeceColeman4 @eagle252525 @TheNewEuropean @campbellclaret If you don't have borders and can't make your own laws, you don't have a nation.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@ReeceColeman4 @eagle252525 @TheNewEuropean @campbellclaret Nationalism is indeed challenging libtard hegemony, in the UK and US.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@ReeceColeman4 @eagle252525 @TheNewEuropean @campbellclaret What you fear is the destruction of libtard hegemony.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@ReeceColeman4 @eagle252525 @TheNewEuropean @campbellclaret It is libtard hegemony that has destroyed national identity of Western nations.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@ReeceColeman4 @eagle252525 @TheNewEuropean @campbellclaret Without a sense of national identity and independence, a nation cannot exist.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@ReeceColeman4 @eagle252525 @TheNewEuropean @campbellclaret The will of the people was the result given in the plebiscite you so abhor.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad The voters believed that their decision would be implemented without further word games by the establishment.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad Cameron had to offer an EU referendum because he wanted to win the 2015 general election.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad Perhaps the political classes will be "advised", after the armed insurrection that overthrows their government.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@EUtopean @BlackXList @BostonManorRoad I also expected that the political classes would seek to subvert Brexit.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean Yes, I do know that the political classes can continue to fuck with us and laugh in our faces.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @EUtopean @BostonManorRoad Based on the logic of the question "Why have a referendum if you are just going to ignore it?"— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @EUtopean @BostonManorRoad The answer may be "Offering the referendum was a way for the Tories to win the 2015 General Election"— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @EUtopean @BostonManorRoad The answer may well be "The only point the political classes do anything is just to fuck with you."— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @EUtopean @BostonManorRoad Then OUR answer would be: "When we are angry enough at you for fucking with us, we'll overthrow you."— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean Currently, our government is matriarchy. If we don't like it, the solution is patriarchy.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean Once we decide that patriarchy is the lesser evil, we can go about establishing a patriarchy.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean If it appears that feminazis have taken over the West, it is because they have taken over.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean The first step towards overthrowing the matriarchy is to recognise we live in one.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean The second step towards overthrowing the matriarchy is to resolve to have a patriarchy.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean We resolve to have patriarchy after we have decided it is the lesser evil.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean We resolve to have patriarchy after we have decided that matriarchy is the greater evil.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean We resolve to have patriarchy once we believe it can be done.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@VeryAngryHobbit @hippogriff169 @RaheemKassam We know the system is rigged against social conservatives/nationalists/patriarchy by libtards.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @EUtopean @BostonManorRoad So now we know that we should stop bothering to vote for anything and just overthrow the government.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @EUtopean @BostonManorRoad So now we know the real purpose of that advisory plebiscite: to delay and betray.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean It is a logical conclusion. Female voters love Big Sister government and that's what the EU is.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean Reward for men in a patriarchy: fairer competition, higher status and to live in a sovereign state.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean I was aware that the referendum was advisory. It has been said enough times by @ClarkeMicah— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad They could say triggering Article 50 is repealing the European Communities Act 1972.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@EUtopean Democracy is not the important thing, but whether Britain becomes a sovereign nation again.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@BlackXList @BostonManorRoad @EUtopean Most women want to live under the EU and most women hate Trump ergo they want the matriarchy.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@VeryAngryHobbit @HeartHasGone @RaheemKassam National sovereignty is something all nations have, but some refuse to exercise it.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@caroldoug67 @thatginamiller There is no rule of law when the rules are unclear and changed when the game is still in play.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@VeryAngryHobbit @HeartHasGone @RaheemKassam I am saying I want to live in a sovereign state that governs in the national interest.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
@VeryAngryHobbit @HeartHasGone @RaheemKassam Currently, our political philosophers seem unable to define the national interest.— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) November 6, 2016
1 comment:
They say our parliament should be consulted on this decision and parliament should have the final word but fail to realize that in a federal EU our parliament and laws will become irrelevant?
Several of the judges have vested interests in the EU. They should be disqualified from making decisions on this matter !!
Post a Comment