Translate

Tuesday, 23 August 2016

Who is pushing gender dysphoria and why?

The 18 year old son of a friend had committed suicide after suffering from gender dysphoria. His parents were actually supportive of him, but that did not help, because he basically looked like a man and even played rugby. I curse the BBC for their campaign to normalise gender dysphoria.

Many of us wish we were cleverer, richer, more beautiful, desirable and influential than we actually are, and in a higher social class too, no doubt, and possibly a different race. But we can't all get what we want.

My position remains that anyone who wants to mutilate their sex organs and sterilise themselves in order to be happier as a member of the opposite sex is in fact mentally ill.

Mental illness I would define as being irrational and obsessed.

It is obviously irrational to suppose that we would be happier as a member of the opposite sex after we have sterilised ourselves.

For one thing we wouldn't look right and people would think we are obviously weird. This means we are not going to get much sex, or any sex from any decent person who might want to have a long term relationship with us.

This would only make us more mentally ill if we were already mentally ill to begin with.

While people are understandably ashamed of being mentally ill, mental illness is curable, especially if it is the usual kind of mental illness suffered in adolescence.

We all know teenagers kill themselves at the drop of a hat, over failed exams in the East, over being dumped in the West, or over something we as adults find unbelievably trivial. This is probably because as teenagers we suffer from growing pains and cannot imagine ourselves getting over whatever calamity we think we have suffered. As well-adjusted adults, we know we have been there and got all the T-shirts of being dumped, disappointed, bereaved, betrayed, rejected and sacked.
I repeat: mental illness is curable, but knowing that you can never be a beautiful woman because you are a man is not.

The only cure for gender dysphoria is transition, apparently.

The old fashioned way to deal with these things was for the father to tell the son to pull himself together, or else. He might even tell his son that it is actually a privilege to be a man though it is harder to be a man than a woman, because a man has to act, while a woman merely to desist, and keep herself looking half way decent while she is constraining the natural exuberance of her nature.
The 21st century way of dealing with gender dysphoria is to let these pre-pubescents have hormone treatment before they are adult so they will be able to hide their maleness better.

The best way of parenting when our adolescent children threaten to commit suicide because you made them miss an episode of their favourite TV programme must surely be to tell them menacingly that they ain't seen nothing yet about the things in life that might just upset them.

I suppose if you as a parent were disapproving and hostile, you would get blamed for the suicide.
If you were accommodating towards your son transitioning, you would get more sympathy at the funeral. This is PC Britain after all.

QUESTIONS

1. Imagine your son will commit suicide whether or not you are supportive of having his gender dysphoria being cured by transition. With the benefit of this hindsight, how would you be towards him?

a) Supportive of his desire for transition
b) Disapproving and hostile towards his proposed transition

Please also give reasons.

2. On a scale of 0 to 100, how wicked is it to encourage vulnerable adolescent males into thinking that gender dysphoria resulting in transitioning is in any way desirable?

3. Should the position you take on gender dysphoria depend entirely on how the hypothetical mourners at your son's hypothetical funeral think of you in PC Britain?

4. Isn't there a medically ethical position to take on these matters with the public interest in mind?

5. Should the government really be encouraging adolescents who say they are suffering from gender dysphoria to transition when most of them are frankly mad, silly and barely know their minds from one year to the next?

6. Why is the government not discouraging this industry?

7. Cui bono?

Saturday, 13 August 2016

Taking the sting out of that wife-beating verse in the Koran

The verse atheist liberal feminists hate most in the Koran concerns a husband's rights over his wife, if he maintains her:

004.034
YUSUFALI: Men are the protectors and maintainers of women,because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all).

PICKTHAL: Men are in charge of women, because Allah hath made the one of them to excel the other, and because they spend of their property (for the support of women). So good women are the obedient, guarding in secret that which Allah hath guarded. As for those from whom ye fear rebellion, admonish them and banish them to beds apart, and scourge them. Then if they obey you, seek not a way against them. Lo! Allah is ever High, Exalted, Great.

SHAKIR: Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great.

You would have thought a reasonably intelligent woman could easily avoid being beaten if she heeded all the prior warnings she would get from her husband before she got her beating.

An employee gets a verbal warning, a written warning and then a final warning before being sacked by his employer.

A recalcitrant wife also gets two warnings over a longish period of time before she gets beaten. How long would it take a husband to formally admonish his wife? If he takes it up to the next level ie does not have sex with her and makes her sleep in the spare room or the sofa, then clearly she has not modified her behaviour.

There should be a Matrimonial Disputes Tribunal for the admonition to be first registered, to see that both parties to the dispute are taking this matrimonial dispute seriously.

I don't see why we cannot have a Matrimonial Disputes website for these admonitions to be registered online and for the wife to have a right of reply if she does not think the husbandly admonition justified or reasonable.

If the recalcitrant wife does not mend her behaviour, he can just give her a slap on the wrist and record the fact with the Matrimonial Disputes Tribunal that he has "beaten" her.

If she still does not mend her behaviour, he can proceed to divorce her under the rules of fault-based divorce.

That would sound fair enough to me. (Contrary to rumours that I am really a white man pretending to be a female and foreigner, I am in fact female and not white. I just think, talk and write like a man because that is how I would like things to be if I were a man and felt compelled to marry and have legitimate offspring and in so doing invest in the future of his society, nation and civilisation.)

Friday, 12 August 2016

Whose moustache is best?

What is capable of challenging the current political orthodoxy?

Radical Islam is a reaction to PC Liberalism.

If we don't like PC Liberalism, what is the alternative?

Conservatism or Nationalism? But neither are developed ideologies, because there is no definitive manual for either.

This means neither Conservatism nor Nationalism is strong enough to defeat PC Liberalism.

Communism has been tried and failed.

Christianity is kaput and Judaism is too hard.

One you have eliminated the impossible, what's left, however improbable, must be the answer.

Wednesday, 10 August 2016

The badges of identity


  1. Country of Birth
  2. Country of Residence
  3. Language spoken
  4. Religion/Politics
  5. Class
  6. Gender
  7. Age
  8. Marital status and whether a parent
  9. Sexuality
  10. Race (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH NATIONALITY)
  11. Nationality (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH RACE)


People who confuse race with nationality tend to be not the brightest or best educated of people and have trouble understanding abstract ideas.

Race is something about yourself you cannot change (unless you are Michael Jackson and prepared to have cosmetic surgery.

Nationality is something you can acquire or lose, like your passport(s). Some people have more than one, someone people don't even have one.

Let us all pray for Trump, even if we don't really believe in God

Although I was aware of the controversy the Democrats had tried to whip up last night after Trump's speech last night about Hillary Clinton taking away Second Amendment rights, the way it was reported by The Today Programme this morning http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07n3c43 - that Trump had incited his supporters to assassinate Clinton and any of the judges she might appoint as POTUS - chilled my blood.

The entire West should hang its head in shame at the way its media has collectively treated Trump, truth and logic.

As Orwell said, "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." Both Trump and I are revolutionaries for being guided by truth, logic and the idea of promoting the national interest.

Let us pray for Trump - even if we doubt God's existence - that good will triumph over evil, and truth stand clear from error [Koran 2:256]. Trump is only one man, and his enemies the neocons, neoliberals and globalists control the military industrial complex as well as the entire Western media, including the BBC. It will focus our aspiration to be led by a brave and sane man rather than a woman who is the puppet of special interest groups who control the military industrial complex of the West. You don't have to be American to support Trump, just a citizen of its vassal states appalled by its insane policy of starting WW3 by trying everyone's patience.

https://www.facebook.com/search/top/?q=world%20prayer%20group%20for%20donald%20trump%20%20atheists%20welcome


Tuesday, 9 August 2016

Michael Scheuer says 50 anti-Trump Republicans should be "retired" and "ignored"

Republican security experts rail against Trump in open letter

Open letter signed by 50 Republican national security experts warning that nominee Donald Trump "would be the most reckless president" in US history

Incoherent blather from General Hayden from 24th minute.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07mvxwr

From 28th minute

Michael Scheuer:

General Hayden presided over the shredding of the Fourth Amendment when Obama and Bush spied over every American with their electronic equipment. 

On the question of the letter, I think Mr Trump should be delighted. Two days from now is twenty years since Osama Bin Laden declared war on us, and everything we have tried to do has been negative. All of the young men and women who have lost lives and limbs in Iraq and Afghanistan did it for nothing. There's no freedom there, there's no liberty there and in the course of these unnecessary wars there is less liberty at home.

Martha Kearney:

But you know how important the role of the President is as Commander in Chief and these are fifty senior Republicans and many of them hold very high positions in different administrations and they say he is going to be the most reckless President in American history and has many dangerous qualities. 

Michael Scheuer:

More reckless than Obama who just paid $400,000,000 to ransom four Americans? His State Department and your Foreign Ministries in Europe connived with the Ukrainian opposition to bring down a pro-Russian government and re-started the Cold War. What could be more reckless than that?

Martha Kearney:

Well, I think the argument goes to temperament, doesn't it? You can have policy differences and people may well disagree with the direction that President Obama has taken but what these Republicans are saying crosses the political divide - is that his temperament makes him unsuitable for the job?

Michael Scheuer:

I would prefer him not to be so vocal at times, but I also like someone who says what they think and what he says is that America should come first. As we speak, I'm looking at pictures of British Special Forces operating in Syria. We were out of the Iraq-Syria mess and now we are back into it. What kind of governments do we have? We are letting in unvetted Syrians and I read in your press this morning that you're going to give political asylum to Muslim Brotherhood people from Egypt. I think the old gang which is represented by the list we are speaking of deserves to be retired and deserves to be ignored.

Martha Kearney:

But interestingly you say you wish he wouldn't be quite so vocal - and you may be right about that - and the way we judge him by is the kind of thing he's saying on the campaign trail and that is giving some people the impression that he is reckless such as the people who signed the Republican letter.

Michael Scheuer:

I can't speak for your media but I don't mind what he says except for the fact that the media here is in a tank this morning for Hillary Clinton. You played a clip from ABC in America and of course their main person George Stephanopoulos is owned by the Clintons and as a journalist gives money to the Clinton Foundation and other Clinton Organisations ...

Martha Kearney:

Well, that might be the case but it's not the case with the people who signed this letter, is it?

Michael Scheuer:

Oh, the people who signed the letter! If you go down the list, they're the ones who want America to be intervening everywhere around the world. They're the New World Order people, they're the ones who brought us all these unnecessary wars. If you go down the list, there is also at least thirty people who prize the interests of Israel more than the interests of the United States, and that's the real rub for a lot of them, that's the real rub for the Republicans, that America is no longer going to get involved fighting Israel's wars

Martha Kearney:

Dr Michael Scheuer, many thanks for joining us.

http://non-intervention.com/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Scheuer 

Monday, 8 August 2016

The logic of assuming the existence of God

If there was a Creation, there must have been a Creator.

Since we exist, there must have been a Creation.

Since there was a Creation, there must have been a Creator.

Since there was a Creator, it must have been God.

Jewish Labour Peer Lord Glasman wants to use Catholicism as a force for the moral regeneration of the British

http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/issues/july-29th-2016/the-catholic-moment-has-arrived/

Anti-feminist http://leftfootforward.org/images/2011/06/Helen-Goodman-MP-Tradition-and-Change.pdf Maurice Glasman and the man who conceived of Blue Labour and stealing BNP policies http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/dan-hodges/2011/07/blue-labour-maurice-glasman says this:

It is vital not only that the Catholic voice is heard but that it takes a leading role in shaping this moment, so full of promise and peril for our country. It can lead us in the direction of the common good and reassert one of the fundamental teachings of the papal encyclicals: that the old is the new. It is the Catholic tradition that can redeem England’s promise.

Lord Glasman is clearly hoping to use Catholicism as an instrument of government. Why not go the whole hog and use Secular Koranism instead?

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

































Why liberalism will eventually be extinguished by Islam


From the 23rd minute

Roosh says he will not martyr himself or die for a principle. This conclusively demonstrates the fatal weakness of liberalism and atheism, because it tolerates atheism and laws that flout what are said to be God's laws.

An atheist would believe that this life is the only one. He would therefore cling fiercely to it, unwilling to make sacrifices for any principle and seek as much carnal pleasure in this life before his life is snuffed out. A society consisting of mostly men like this would of course fall to more determined men such as IS terrorists who have no fear of death.

The real purpose of religion is to make men and women prepared to make sacrifices for posterity. Liberalism and atheism is the antithesis of this.

Sunday, 7 August 2016

An agnostic prays for Trump's protection and success

Beta males without the leadership of an alpha male are like women in denial, pretending things are not really as bad as I say. Because no beta male would accept the authority of another beta male, angry and gentile white men will just continuing blaming Jews and Muslims for their plight, rather than acknowledge that it is their lack of leadership skills, their effeminacy, degeneracy, irrationality, denial and their fear of being led by an alpha male leader that prevents them from ever organising effectively against the demented matriarchy which oppresses them.

Despicable Tory MPs who wanted to leave the EU but voted for an unreliable woman because they wanted their mummy rather than Michael Gove who offered them conviction and dominance

Pathetic Brexit Tory MPs who supported Leggy Leadsom - an unreliable woman and over-promoted mediocrity who let them down and let May in

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36679741

In Donald Trump American men and women sense an alpha male who could lead them and the world out of the morass the neocons have brought them to. This frightens and dismays the matriarchy to such an extent that it will resort to any dirty trick - however laughable - to prevent him becoming President.

God (if He exists) would protect Trump (as long as he is does not propose anything that flouts God's laws) and confound the knavish tricks of the degenerate matriarchy.

Let us then pray that God if He exists will protect Trump. Indeed, why not pray that an omnipotent and perfectly moral God actually exists, so that Trump is more likely to be protected from a malign matriarchy bent on destroying all that is good about Western civilisation and indeed human civilisation itself?

I urge everyone - even atheists - to pray for Trump's success. It is the least you can do if you are not prepared to donate or argue in his favour because you are a beta male oppressed by the matriarchy scared of being ostracised by your female associates, friends and family or a husband and father afraid of his wife and children.

How would an atheist pray? First, form a wish that you earnestly desire. Then say these words in your head and then share this post with others:

God if He exists would protect Trump because he is an alpha male and offers us an alternative to the neocons, Hillary Clinton and the degenerate matriarchy. If God does not exist then I wish and earnestly desire that He come into being, in order to protect Trump because the entire Western establishment is against him. If Trump succeeds, then more men will follow his example. If he fails then the beta males will be even more demoralised, fearful and useless. 

Trump is a nationalist and God wants us to organise ourselves into nations. In this way is healthy competition possible between nations whom God will reward for following His laws most faithfully.


Unasked questions and unmade points on The Sunday Programme presented by Trevor Barnes
















http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07mvxny

Horrible dream while I slept through this programme but heard it in my dream. I dreamt that I was in the same room with Trevor Barnes, Alexander Lucie Smith and Tina Beattie. I had a burning question I wanted to ask which was obviously not being answered let alone asked. I asked this question repeatedly and loudly till I lost my voice and was still being ignored. Then I woke up and forgot what this question I wanted to ask was. Now listening to the programme from the beginning.

This item was no more than Alexander Lucie Smith signally failing to point out that the whole point of the Abrahamic faiths is to support marriage and maintain the patriarchy which feminists like Tina Beattie are anxious to undermine because they are feminists who regard it as their purpose in life to destroy the patriarchy.

Aghast to find that Trevor Barnes did not ask Rabbi Yoni Birnbaum what he meant by "historic cases of anti-Semitism" and what he wanted done to people found guilty of it. Sent to concentration camp? Some clarification would have been helpful!

Is anti-Semitism thoughtcrime?

Can we have retrospective thoughtcrime?

When did anti-Semitism become thoughtcrime?

Which Act of Parliament said anti-Semitism is thoughtcrime?

Sweden's St Olav's Pilgrim Path to Norway has villages along the way that have been settled by Muslim refugees, presumably because the elderly feminised locals would be easily overwhelmed by the sheer numbers of refugees and give up complaining once they knew that their government doesn't care about them. Arguments are made by a refugee saying how much the Swedish economy has boomed because of them. Certainly, the government is not interested in elderly and unproductive indigenous people when they could be having young male Muslim workers which the female locals welcome for their own reasons. Baptist pastor deeply concerned about the welfare of the refugees and Bob Walker's guide is female.

The white male and his plight brings to my mind a lion and his pride who has acceded to the demands of his harem to be welcoming to visiting males looking to have sexual access to his harem.

Friday, 5 August 2016

Pastor Mark Burns Speaks At Donald Trump Rally in Jacksonville, FL [8/3/16]



How dare race-baiting Democrats forbid black people from voting for Trump? How very dare they!

"We love marriage, the family and babies!" 

Monday, 1 August 2016

An American Muslim explains why he supports Trump and rejects low-energy liberal politicians

 Hillary Clinton praises the Muslim parents of a son who died serving as an American soldier during the Iraq invasion

http://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-trump-pushes-back-against-father-of-fallen-muslim-soldier-1469986267

From 1:17

The mother of an American Muslim soldier killed in Iraq has accused the Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump of being ignorant of Islam after he mocked her appearance at Thursday's Democratic Party National Convention. Sajid Tarar is the founder of the American Muslims for Trump group.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07m50lr

Justin Webb:

Do you think he has over-stepped the mark now, that there is a chance that this rebounds against him in a way that previous things he has said hasn't?

Nope, because Muslim parents whose son died during the Iraq invasion serving as an American soldier should be ashamed rather than proud of themselves. Neocon wars are wars of Western imperialism whose raison d'etre is to invade Muslim countries and steal their oil while pretending to their sheeple that they are doing it to for "human rights" reasons. The sheeple being sheeple obediently consume this crap and are outraged when they suffer from Muslim terrorism, because this means Muslims are not grateful to the West for invading their countries.

Sajid Tarar makes the point that Clinton has 40 years' experience in politics and Tim Kaine 20 to 25 years' experience. They have at least 20+ Ivy League staffers writing their speeches.

The beauty of Donald Trump - he says whatever he feels like. That's what we need. Donald Trump is re-writing the history of American democracy, because these people with 40, 45 years' experience - these people have failed Washington DC. Washington DC has become a non-functional town. Since he has started his candidacy the liberal media is trying to twist everything single thing in the US against him. Donald Trump said he wanted to ban Muslims with exceptions: from the war torn countries. The media is forgetting the second part. He's saying he wants to build the wall, but with doors, where people can legally come in, but they omitted the door part. Even now he is saying he is not using the name Islam or Muslim. He just wants to ban the terrorists. I am an American Muslim. I want to see America safe, I want to see the world safe, and I am tired of low-energy politicians. Britain coming out of the EU is the biggest example that socialist globalisation is not the solution - it's not going to work. I am in favour of strong leadership. Barack Obama in eight years didn't do anything for Muslims. ISIS grew up on Hillary Clinton's watch. Her failed policies have helped terrorists and ISIS to grow up. That's what we don't want. I want a strong leader to command the US and make America safe. My kids are living in fear. If anything happens here in this country, we all start praying it's not another Muslim. Look at what is going on in France and Belgium and everywhere. I want a happy and safe Europe and a safe Middle East. This is what the issue is: Europe is facing low-energy politicians and people are rejecting the legacy politics and people are sick of professional politicians.

http://theislamicmonthly.com/the-reaction-to-my-prayer-at-the-rnc-should-make-america-reflect/

Vote Trump, not Hillary Clinton, or else