Translate

Monday, 22 May 2017

Men who deserve patriarchy


1. Men who want legitimate offspring


2. Men prepared to call for the abolition of no fault divorce

3. Men who are marriageable ie capable of attracting marriageable women

4. Men prepared to risk liberty and reputation to challenge and defeat the stinking matriarchy

What is the percentage of adult men prepared to do this?

Do you think this figure is over or under 50%?

Are Western men hopelessly cucked?

If they are really hopelessly cucked and not prepared to fight for this because they are so hopelessly cucked, then it means they don't deserve a patriarchy.

When their civilisation and cities fall to invaders who slay them and take their women, these contemptibly degenerate men will be exterminated and extinct, and the problem of men who do not deserve patriarchy will solve itself.







Cucked Western men protest against feminism by calling themselves non-feminists instead of anti-feminists

https://antifeministpraxis.com/2017/05/16/are-you-a-feminist-or-are-you-not-there-is-no-middle-ground/

Logically, the option is not choosing between being NEUTRAL about something and being FOR it.

It must be between being AGAINST something and FOR it.

An attribute of feminisation in men is poor reasoning abilities and denial, a feminine vice.

If you are afraid of your enemy, you understandably refrain from making overt declarations of hostility.

Beta male victims of feminism, like women, only have the power to withhold, for they no longer have the power to strive and obtain.

This contemptible trait in cucked Western men is precisely what Muslim radicals despise.

They reasonably conclude that allowing their male offspring to marinate in the degenerate values and practices of the matriarchy would eventually result in their male descendants becoming cucked beta male victims of feminism and their female descendants becoming promiscuous women and unmarried mothers, submitting to the stinking degenerate matriarchy rather than to truth, logic and morality.

To cultures known for practising the civilising traditions of marriage and family values, the very idea that their descendants will be born illegitimate of unmarried mothers who casually conceived them and who will parent them badly is a prospect dreadful and disgraceful.

I am very much aware that what I am proposing is blasphemy in our matriarchy. There was once a time when heretics were burned. Even if this penalty is not these days inflicted, men have all sorts of considerations to take into account, eg their sex partner's wrath and their probable withdrawal of sexual access thus making domestic life uncomfortable if not insufferable.

Not having a wife or potential sex partners whom I fear will withdraw sexual access if I offend her or their political sensibilities, I am probably the best placed person in the entire West to lead the campaign to re-establish the patriarchy.

Sadly, Western Man is now so cucked he won't consider availing himself of this unmissable opportunity because he is afraid of being associated with me and my idea of imposing a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

Wishing to wound but afraid to strike: this is a very much a feminine predicament.

The men vanquished by women would inevitably take on the mindset of their conquerors and become themselves feminised in their thinking and behaviour. Very sad. This means men really just become women with penis extensions, effectively becoming incapable of defending either a principle much less their nation. This will embolden and encourage our enemies.

Men need a safe space to discuss this amongst yourselves. Women will always want standards of sexual morality to be comfortably low because it is women who get knocked up and are left holding the baby.

Only men actually prepared to make the sacrifices of being an ANTIFEMINIST and uncompromisingly calling for the return of patriarchy through obeying the rules of marriage (ie no extramarital sex) will have the will to power.

The cucks of the West will have no concept of the heroic ideal. These days most Western men are unprincipled and spineless worms with no masculinity to insult, easily cowed by threats or persuaded by bribes, but fungible units of consumption cucked by their atheism and their indifference to principle and posterity.

They will make weak complaining noises and eventually fade away and expire without issue.

Come to think of it, men are now too cucked to even dare ask for a safe space for themselves.

If any of their number should even dare to propose this, they will be shot in the back by the cucks.

What I have described above is the reality of how cucked Western men are, is it not?

Even now  they are hiding under the skirts of woman instead of doing it for yourselves.

Men against feminism should tell women against feminism their views don't and won't matter because they can defeat the matriarchy without their support



Feminism has utterly destroyed the quality of masculinity of Western Man.

The reason why feminists demand that their countries take in migrant Muslim men is because they instinctively know they would be rather raped by them than willingly fuck or breed with such a sorry bunch of self-abnegating cucks.

Who are these European women in effect asking for Muslim migrant men to enter their countries and penetrate their vaginas? They would be the female voters of child-bearing age who voted for Macron and will be voting for Merkel this September.

Nearly half of young French voters backed Marine Le Pen, projections suggest Far-right candidate receives support from just 20 per cent of over-65s MORE ELDERLY FEMALE VOTERS THAN ELDERLY MALE VOTERS

French election: Emmanuel Macron's marriage to an older woman key to his appeal with voters MACRON: THE MOST HIGH STATUS CUB A COUGAR COULD HAVE

Why men will never get back their country again as long as democratic politicians keep chasing the female vote

Migrant fucking sluts

Sunday, 21 May 2017

The most valuable things everyone following Jordan Peterson ought to know and ask him about

Beta males like Mike Buchanan cannot win the fight against feminism

Marginalised beta males complaining about feminazi oppression

Claire Khaw not speaking at London anti-feminist conference on 8-10 July 2016

Claire Khaw no-platformed from Bath University debate on feminism

If A Voice For Men in the US and Mike Buchanan in the UK can't fight feminism, they should stand aside for Claire Khaw

Why men will never get back their country again as long as democratic politicians keep chasing the female vote

Today, I discovered White Sharia

https://www.facebook.com/Why-not-have-a-one-party-state-if-it-makes-more-sense-353471931432677/



https://www.facebook.com/Secular-Koranism-657868884251333/

Saturday, 20 May 2017

Egalitarianism is infantile and based on a polite fiction

Egalitarianism is infantile, but women tend to be sentimental and childish in many ways because it is nature's way of making them better equipped to look after children. Egalitarianism will always be found attractive by the majority of the people who would otherwise find themselves at the bottom of the heap. The twin pressure of the female and proletarian preference for egalitarianism would work to destroy your society if left unchecked, and their work is now almost complete.

The enemies of society are sluts and socialists, who walk hand in hand.

The stupid promiscuous woman and the hungry MCSF/SJW who are her running dogs will insist on her preference being prioritised with no thought for the long term national interest.

http://thebattlefieldoflove.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/all-spossms-are-mcsfs-but-not-all-mcsfs.html

These are the gathering dark forces preparing to wreck Western civilisation, while senior politicians of the West remain in denial and heedless to these warnings.

There are not even elderly intellectuals prepared to discuss this. Roger Scruton the Conservative philosopher refuses to discuss feminism because he fears his wife who will soon be his nurse. As for the media, they were taken over by the feminazis a long long time ago.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/roger-scruton-conservative-philosopher.html

The obscenity of sex education at 4 will soon be compulsory.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2017/02/28/ministers-set-announce-plans-compulsory-sex-education-lessons/

The purpose of this is to entrench the stinking matriarchy, which will continue to bribe and corrupt men until we and our descendants will be the co-equals of bonobo monkeys after becoming the Amalekites the Jews have a religious duty to exterminate.

http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/267677/jewish/Wipe-Out-Amalek-Today.htm

Muslims would call the struggle by men against the promiscuous fornicating slut a form of Greater Jihad.

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Lesser_vs_Greater_Jihad

We know that the hopelessly corrupt Western political establishment won't touch this subject with a barge pole, not even those who protest against the current incumbents. Even Paul Craig Roberts refuses to consider the role of feminism in the moral corruption and sheer moronic stupidity and the unbelievable insouciance of political life in America and the West.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/

No one gets it and no one will discuss it.

E Michael Jones in Libido Dominandi says sexual freedom replaces political freedom.

Whoever controls sexual behaviour controls the state. And he who controls the mores of women controls sexual behaviour. That is the first lesson of sexual politics. He who understands that law understands why pornography and sex education and abortion and the government funding of contraceptives are all non-negotiable conditions for the current regime. Without them, they could not rule.

Feminism rode into town on the coat-tails of egalitarianism. If they are not already extinct or too elderly, perhaps men of the West capable of defending patriarchal moral values will have the sense and courage to have Feminism metaphorically tarred and feathered before running her out of town.

The Bostonians Paying the Excise-Man, 1774 British propaganda print that depicts the tarring and feathering of Boston Commissioner of Customs John Malcolm. This was the second time that Malcolm had been tarred and feathered.

Women in the workplace

Regrettably, this has lowered standards in public life. Because women are entitled to the excuses and privileges of their sex, men now feel they are entitled to the excuses and privileges of the feminine sex in the name of gender equality and gender justice. This explains our Culture of Entitlement and Excuses and why fathers now have paternity leave, increasing labour costs and lowering further our international competitiveness.

Today, I discovered White Sharia







http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

https://www.facebook.com/Secular-Koranism-657868884251333/

https://www.dailystormer.com/what-is-white-sharia-and-what-choices-do-i-have-in-accepting-it-or-not/

http://shoebat.com/2017/04/15/major-national-socialist-website-now-openly-promotes-white-sharia-we-warned-you-this-was-coming/

What happens to people who say we should return to Christian morality?

They are mercilessly mocked.

The late Mrs Whitehouse was mercilessly mocked.

No one takes Christianity seriously, and even if they did, it is hard to defend because of the requirement to believe in the doctrine of the Trinity, which is controversial enough even amongst Christians.

Not only that, the Catholic Church, the most powerful church in the world, now has a liberal Pope and is hopelessly mired in the paedo priests scandal. It no longer has moral authority and clergy are afraid of discussing morality or anything controversial to do with standards of sexual morality.  If clergy got into trouble with the media over standing up for a principle, they would be hung out to dry and their career obstructed and ended.

Michael Voris and the Church Militant are now classified as extremist just for holding on the Catholic principles.

Catholics who take Catholicism seriously are on the whole middle aged to elderly with the young not much interested. No revolution ever was organised by the senescent and elderly.

There is no prospect of sedevacantism succeeding without armed force and no prospect of acquiring this armed force in a society that is overwhelmingly atheist.

If you wanted to use religion as a basis of effecting a revolution, it would not be Christianity, simply because it is perceived as stale, tried and failed. It is perceived to be the the religion of the senescent and is certainly not in the ascendant. If Catholicism is a moon, it is waning, not waxing. We also know that the reason why Catholic clergy are so supine is because they know that the only choice left to them in the face of accusations of paedo priests is simply to surrender and submit to the prevailing matriarchy and hope they get to keep their position and pensions while they live.

There  is only one religion that causes consternation and controversy in the political establishment, and it is the one Islamophobes hate and fear.

Oderint dum metuant.

Like it or not, the Koran is the only reliable source of social conservatism, and social conservatism is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy and nationalism.

Without leadership and without being encouraged or exhorted to do so, people will not voluntarily and naturally turn from vice to virtue.  If Europeans spontaneously and suddenly felt an overwhelming desire for religion and social conservatism, they would not be turning to the tired, stale and failed religion of the elders.  The church has been completely rotted by feminism and it stinks to high heaven. The old may cling to Christianity, but the young know it is not for them if they want a future for themselves, their children, their descendants and their nation.

The young already despise the old for the way they have frittered away their inheritance, or they would when they think about it.  Baby boomers have been identified as the ones most liberal and most irresponsible, socially and fiscally. They are the ones now in charge and therefore the ones in denial while they continue to fuck things up.

If we think we are on our way out, we just do what we are comfortable with: go to church and pray the way we used to, and hope the church and the clergyman we are used to continues to exist until we ourselves are no longer in need of it.

Christianity is not going to inspire anyone capable of effecting a change. Only the young are capable of doing so. The young will have no time or patience for the platitudes of the elderly about to fade away who are not thinking about the future of the next generation, only about staying well within their own comfort zone and pretending to themselves and to next generation that they did nothing wrong.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/30/us/church-militant-theology-is-put-to-new-and-politicized-use.html

Michael Voris of Church Militant is fighting a losing battle because he will never get enough Catholics to join his cause to make Catholicism both powerful or viable without a counter-revolution. Even if Voris were already Pope now, he would still be compromised and cucked the way Trump is, with the deep state gunning for him. Whatever populist ideology the people would back at the risk of life, limb and property to effect a counter-revolution against the sex revolution and matriarchy cannot be done on the back of Catholicism or any other established church for all the obvious reasons of being perceived to be old, tired, weak, corrupt, effeminate and fatally feminised.

Even the Greek Orthodox Church is compromised.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/orthodox-give-highest-award-to-pro-abort-biden...for-defending-human-rights

Presumably this is why the Greeks are in the state they're in: in debt and for all practical purposes enslaved.

13:11 Koran:

God does not change the lot of those who do not change what is in their hearts. 

Secular Koranism

https://www.facebook.com/Secular-Koranism-657868884251333/

https://www.dailystormer.com/what-is-white-sharia-and-what-choices-do-i-have-in-accepting-it-or-not/

http://shoebat.com/2017/04/15/major-national-socialist-website-now-openly-promotes-white-sharia-we-warned-you-this-was-coming/

Overhauling Islam: Representation, Construction, and Cooption of “Moderate Islam” in Western Europe

How to stop undermining the patriarchy and re-establish it



It is really only fornicating sluts that men cannot say no to that undermine the patriarchy. Notice how our feminist matriarchy treats proposals to shame sluts as akin to blasphemy? That is because feminism operates on bribing and distracting men with premarital sex. If men can get sex before marriage, they are less likely to marry or defend marriage. Being primarily motivated by sex, men will do anything for sex, including marry. Men must acknowledge that they are the weaker sex in saying no to no-strings sex and treat any attempt by sluts to offer them premarital sex as an attempt to undermine the patriarchy and nation, if not human civilisation itself.

"Get thee away from me, thou fornicating temptress!" could be a useful form of words for Western Man to use against any loose woman eagerly pressing him to accept her sexual favours and services.

It is to be doubted that Western Man is actually capable of refusing sex from women eager to have sex with him: it would be like expecting a starving man to refuse free delicious hot food. Unless there are laws to protect Western Man from shameless sluts, I fear the project to sanctify marriage again in the West will fail. All is not lost, for quran.com/24/2 would publicly humiliate sluts. Once this is implemented, the number of fornicating sluts would be significantly reduced, making marriage again an attractive bargain to men who want legitimate children and social respectability. No fault divorce would have to be abolished before marriage again becomes an attractive bargain to men, however.

Advice to young people holding Conservative and Nationalist views considering university



I remember my law student days and the mockery that came with it. The memory that comes to mind is one of students reading out the Riot Act in my presence, which I took in good part. How about proposing and organising a group to protect the interests and rights of students and employees holding Conservative and Nationalist views? Remember, what does not kill you makes you stronger!

Why we are now an Idiocracy



Marriage is eugenic, bastardy dysgenic. 

The most important rule of marriage - now absolutely forgotten in the West - is that our sex partner must be our spouse and we can only have one at a time (unless we are a Muslim man and even then only if we can afford to have more than one up to a maximum of four and have the patience and time to make a good show of being fair to them). Not only must our spouse be fuckable, s/he must be a good for a long term relationship and have the characteristics of a good parent such as patience and a caring nature. Marriage is therefore an additional filter for the people we find fuckable because it tells us that it is wrong to fuck people just because we find them fuckable for they must also be good for a long term relationship with children. Even if we don't find them that fuckable, as women we should still prefer someone whom we think is a good prospect as a long term partner and parent than someone we find merely fuckable. If we ignore these rules, our race gets stupider and stupider and our government more and more corrupt until we are now where we are in the West with our morals in the toilet like a turd about to be flushed away.

Women should bear in mind that men are not that fussy, according MGTOW Is Freedom. According to him, men who are single and looking just want their spouse to be good enough, and want every woman they meet to be The One, so they can stop looking. 

From the 9th minute:




Friday, 19 May 2017

the BELL Curve - f¤cking funny - one of my favourite MGTOWs being true and funny


How the British Welfare System Favours Muslims




Anything A Man Can Do - MGTOW

A warning against the amoral tribalism of identity politics




This means the West is closer to civil war if disagreements cannot be resolved peacefully.

The left allies itself with women's interests, the right with men's.

Once battle is joined and we all know who our enemies and their running dogs are, the outcome seems inevitable. 

Is rape culture a feminist racket to discourage men from going to university?

Is this to make them even lower in status to the promiscuous woman?

This will make them angry, bitter, violent and criminal. 

Feminists will use this fact to call for ever more repressive measures against men, causing them to become even more angry, bitter, violent and criminal and so the vicious circle will continue, until the parasites overwhelm the host and resort to cannibalism ... 

Notice how no feminist will discuss any of these issues or answer any questions you might reasonably ask?

Well, they already control the media. Even the men are feminazi appointees and already castrated, especially BBC male presenters with girly haircuts and glasses on Sunday who call themselves Nicky.  

You can fight back risking your liberty, or let the acid bath of feminism wash all over you and everything you hold dear. 




Time for Western men to realise that the burden of proof in a rape case is for the accused to prove his innocence ie a negative and the standard of proof required for the prosecution to convict the accused of rape is no longer the criminal standard of proof ie beyond reasonable doubt.

Why don't male criminal lawyers say something about this? Because they are already cucked and afraid of their female colleagues in the legal profession falsely accusing them of rape, probably. In Britain, the Director of Public Prosecutions is female, so male lawyers practising in the field of criminal law dare not even be seen to be discussing ideas with someone who uses the word "feminazi" ie me.

https://twitter.com/search?l=&q=from%3Antfem%20to%3ALukeSGittos1986&src=typd 
has my tweets to Luke Gittos. He has deleted all his tweets to me after blocking me, presumably for using the word "feminazi" in case any of his female colleagues report him to the Directrix of Public Prosecutions and ruin his career. 

Be afraid. Be very very afraid, not just for yourself, but for the future of your civilisation.

When men are so morally corrupt they let every principle slide for the sake of expediency because they no longer believe in God and no longer care to defend truth, logic and morality, you know your civilisation is fucked. Even the women know this intuitively. That is why they want migrant men to come to the West and prefer to be raped by them rather than breed with contemptible cucks who are so spineless they wouldn't know what a principle is, let alone what it is for, even when it comes up and kicks them in the place where their balls should be. 
 

A warning to men who are BMVOF*: things will get much worse very quickly if you continue to ignore the problem of feminism 

Our matriarchy does not care about BMVOF. Being a matriarchy, they will always prioritise the concerns of female voters whose support is crucial to winning any election.

The more men become BMVOF, the more feminists will use these men as evidence that men are inferior to women, and claim more privileges against men, creating even more BMVOF creating more evidence men are inferior to women, increasing the female demand for more privileges against men etc etc. Feminists don't care about male mental health. The more neurotic he is, the more vulnerable to feminine manipulation he is. Eventually the few men allowed to live will be drones for the purpose of mating with the queen and the only female allowed to mate is the queen. Male chicks and bulls are routinely destroyed, for obvious reasons.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/hatched-discarded-gassed-what-happens-to-male-chicks-in-the-uk-10088509.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bull


Other than the few bulls needed for breeding, the vast majority of male cattle are slaughtered for meat before the age of three years, except where they are needed (castrated) as work oxen for haulage.

Points to bear in mind about the imperative of defeating feminism:

1. Men who want legitimate male offspring must campaign ruthlessly to abolish no fault divorce to clear the decks for themselves, or else be financially ruined by the rules of no fault divorce which will in addition deprive of them of access to their children by their malicious and vengeful ex-wives.

2. Men who want to defeat feminism must not put the cart of sexual access before the horse of re-establishing the patriarchy.

3. Men who want to defeat feminism must not put the cart of marriage before the horse of abolishing no fault divorce.

4. Men unprepared to defend marriage who do not send the vile baggage of feminism packing really do not deserve to have offspring.

5. A nation that has no senior and honourable men prepared to acknowledge the need to re-establish patriarchy through uncompromisingly supporting marriage does not deserve to survive.

6. A nation whose senior male politicians are too morally degenerate and intellectually dishonest they cannot acknowledge that marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

7. A nation in which no  respectable or honourable men of talent or political ambition can publicly acknowledge that marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

8. A nation in which no men of talent or political ambition can acknowledge that nationhood cannot exist without the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

9. A nation in which no men of talent, leadership or political ambition can be bestir themselves to challenge and defeat the matriarchy because they are atheists and do not care what happens to their country after they are dead does not deserve to survive.

*BMVOF - Beta Male Victims of Feminism


Thursday, 18 May 2017

Female academic awarded £233,574 to research "masculinity norms"

Dr Bonny Hartley


Bonny Hartley:

"I was awarded £233,574 in 2016 for a three-year British Academy Postdoctoral Fellowship to explore whether and how masculinity norms contribute to boys’ underachievement at school, and the effectiveness of intervening on these norms to improve boys’ achievement."

http://www.britac.ac.uk/how-masculinity-norms-contribute-boys-underachievement-school

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/sep/01/girls-boys-schools-gender-gap

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/7973419/Boys-held-back-by-school-stereotypes.html

A warning to men who are BMVOF*: things will get much worse very quickly if you continue to ignore the problem of feminism 

Our matriarchy does not care about BMVOF. Being a matriarchy, they will always prioritise the concerns of female voters whose support is crucial to winning any election.

The more men become BMVOF, the more feminists will use these men as evidence that men are inferior to women, and claim more privileges against men, creating even more BMVOF creating more evidence men are inferior to women, increasing the female demand for more privileges against men etc etc. Feminists don't care about male mental health. The more neurotic he is, the more vulnerable to feminine manipulation he is. Eventually the few men allowed to live will be drones for the purpose of mating with the queen and the only female allowed to mate is the queen. Male chicks and bulls are routinely destroyed, for obvious reasons.


Points to bear in mind about the imperative of defeating feminism:

1. Men who want legitimate male offspring should campaign ruthlessly to abolish no fault divorce to clear the decks for themselves, or else be financially ruined by the rules of no fault divorce which will in addition deprive of them of access to their children in practice.

2. Men who want to defeat feminism must not put the cart of sexual access before the horse of re-establishing the patriarchy.

3. Men who want to defeat feminism must not put the cart of marriage before the horse of abolishing no fault divorce.

4. Men unprepared to defend marriage who do not send the vile baggage of feminism packing really do not deserve to have offspring.

5. A nation whose men cannot acknowledge the need to re-establish patriarchy through uncompromisingly supporting marriage does not deserve to survive.

6. A nation whose senior male politicians are too morally degenerate and intellectually dishonest they cannot acknowledge that marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

7. A nation in which no men of talent or political ambition can acknowledge that marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

8. A nation in which no men of talent or political ambition can acknowledge that nationhood cannot exist without the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

9. A nation in which no men of talent, leadership or political ambition can be bestir themselves to challenge and defeat the matriarchy because they are atheists and do not care what happens to their country after they are dead does not deserve to survive.

*BMVOF - Beta Male Victims of Feminism

My message to those concerned about BMVOF* attending the Male Psychology Conference in June 2017

* Beta Male Victims of Feminism 

In a matriarchy all men are BMVOF. 

The West is a matriarchy where the female preference is queen. 

Even Trump - supposedly the most powerful man in the world - is cucked.

Feminism cannot be challenged successfully under the current rules for the reasons explained at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.com/2017/05/why-men-will-never-get-back-their.html


A warning to men who are BMVOF*: things will get much worse very quickly if you continue to ignore the problem of feminism 

Our matriarchy does not care about BMVOF. Being a matriarchy, they will always prioritise the concerns of female voters whose support is crucial to winning any election.

The more men become BMVOF, the more feminists will use these men as evidence that men are inferior to women, and claim more privileges against men, creating even more BMVOF creating more evidence men are inferior to women, increasing the female demand for more privileges against men etc etc. Feminists don't care about male mental health. The more neurotic he is, the more vulnerable to feminine manipulation he is. Eventually the few men allowed to live will be drones for the purpose of mating with the queen and the only female allowed to mate is the queen. Male chicks and bulls are routinely destroyed, for obvious reasons.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/hatched-discarded-gassed-what-happens-to-male-chicks-in-the-uk-10088509.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bull


Other than the few bulls needed for breeding, the vast majority of male cattle are slaughtered for meat before the age of three years, except where they are needed (castrated) as work oxen for haulage.

Points to bear in mind about the imperative of defeating feminism:

1. Men who want legitimate male offspring must campaign ruthlessly to abolish no fault divorce to clear the decks for themselves, or else be financially ruined by the rules of no fault divorce which will in addition deprive of them of access to their children by their malicious and vengeful ex-wives.

2. Men who want to defeat feminism must not put the cart of sexual access before the horse of re-establishing the patriarchy.

3. Men who want to defeat feminism must not put the cart of marriage before the horse of abolishing no fault divorce.

4. Men unprepared to defend marriage who do not send the vile baggage of feminism packing really do not deserve to have offspring.

5. A nation that has no senior and honourable men prepared to acknowledge the need to re-establish patriarchy through uncompromisingly supporting marriage does not deserve to survive.

6. A nation whose senior male politicians are too morally degenerate and intellectually dishonest they cannot acknowledge that marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

7. A nation in which no  respectable or honourable men of talent or political ambition can publicly acknowledge that marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

8. A nation in which no men of talent or political ambition can acknowledge that nationhood cannot exist without the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

9. A nation in which no men of talent, leadership or political ambition can be bestir themselves to challenge and defeat the matriarchy because they are atheists and do not care what happens to their country after they are dead does not deserve to survive.

*BMVOF - Beta Male Victims of Feminism


 *******************************************************************************

You don't have to be a psychologist to recognise that important issues, such as suicide and failure in education, are impacting a relatively high number of men and boys.



If you are interested in crucial issues such as these, then it is my great pleasure to invite you to the fourth annual Male Psychology Conference, at University College London (UCL) on Friday 23rd and Sat 24th June 2017. This really is an unmissable opportunity to  hear and meet with the leading people in this exciting new field and share in the latest thinking and research.



This year we have keynotes from expert on the psychology of suicide, Professor Rory O’Connor, and Canada’s leading combat stress therapist, Professor Marvin Westwood. 



Other keynotes explore the government’s view of the mental health of men and boys (Norman Lamb, MP), and the unrecognised plight of children experiencing parental alienation syndrome (Dr Sue Whitcombe).



We also have exciting presentations on a range of topics, from the treatment of psychopathic sex offenders, to the impact of fathers on children, and the unnoticed victims of domestic violence.



The full conference schedule is here http://www.malepsychology.org.uk/conference-schedule/



Book your ticket here http://www.malepsychology.org.uk/product/male-psychology-conference-tickets/



We look forward to welcoming you to the conference in June!



With kind regards,

John


John Barry, PhD
Honorary Lecturer
Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology
Faculty of Brain Sciences
1-19 Torrington Place
London WC1E 6BT

Message to the men attending the ICMI in Gold Coast 2017





Assuming I am prepared to actually pay you to attend and discuss my ideas at the conference, how much would I have to pay you?

The ideas I want discussed are at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/dr-augusto-zimmermann-cometh-hour.html

A warning to men who are BMVOF*: things will get much worse very quickly if you continue to ignore the problem of feminism 

Our matriarchy does not care about BMVOF. Being a matriarchy, they will always prioritise the concerns of female voters whose support is crucial to winning any election.

The more men become BMVOF, the more feminists will use these men as evidence that men are inferior to women, and claim more privileges against men, creating even more BMVOF creating more evidence men are inferior to women, increasing the female demand for more privileges against men etc etc. Feminists don't care about male mental health. The more neurotic he is, the more vulnerable to feminine manipulation he is. Eventually the few men allowed to live will be drones for the purpose of mating with the queen and the only female allowed to mate is the queen. Male chicks and bulls are routinely destroyed, for obvious reasons.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/hatched-discarded-gassed-what-happens-to-male-chicks-in-the-uk-10088509.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bull


Other than the few bulls needed for breeding, the vast majority of male cattle are slaughtered for meat before the age of three years, except where they are needed (castrated) as work oxen for haulage.
Points to bear in mind about the imperative of defeating feminism:

1. Men who want legitimate male offspring must campaign ruthlessly to abolish no fault divorce to clear the decks for themselves, or else be financially ruined by the rules of no fault divorce which will in addition deprive of them of access to their children by their malicious and vengeful ex-wives.

2. Men who want to defeat feminism must not put the cart of sexual access before the horse of re-establishing the patriarchy.

3. Men who want to defeat feminism must not put the cart of marriage before the horse of abolishing no fault divorce.

4. Men unprepared to defend marriage who do not send the vile baggage of feminism packing really do not deserve to have offspring.

5. A nation that has no senior and honourable men prepared to acknowledge the need to re-establish patriarchy through uncompromisingly supporting marriage does not deserve to survive.

6. A nation whose senior male politicians are too morally degenerate and intellectually dishonest they cannot acknowledge that marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

7. A nation in which no  respectable or honourable men of talent or political ambition can publicly acknowledge that marriage is the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

8. A nation in which no men of talent or political ambition can acknowledge that nationhood cannot exist without the indispensable ingredient of patriarchy does not deserve to survive.

9. A nation in which no men of talent, leadership or political ambition can be bestir themselves to challenge and defeat the matriarchy because they are atheists and do not care what happens to their country after they are dead does not deserve to survive.

*BMVOF - Beta Male Victims of Feminism


What are BMVOFs really trying to do by campaigning to ban male circumcision?

The latest anti-Semitic cry: ban circumcision

Beta male victims of feminism (BMVOFs) are gentile and non-Muslim men who know their status is being lowered relative to women, Jews and Muslims because of their thraldom to fornication. They also know that their political establishment is a matriarchy and know they have no protectors amongst senior male politicians who wouldn't dream of standing up for the interests of BMVOFs, despised by middle class feminazis in government and public life. Because white middle class men in public life are afraid of white middle class feminazis in public life, these BMVOFs know they have no protectors. Why, even the BNP, won't even admit to the existence of BMVOFs and refuse them protection. There was no proposal to abolish no fault divorce by the BNP, was there? This is because so few of them are married. They too worship the slut and dare not offend her.

And so it has come to pass that pretending to be concerned about male circumcision is their effeminate and pathetic way of trying to gain status.

Their thinking is this: if gentiles and non-Muslims save the foreskins of Jewish and Muslim men, they become higher in status.

To pretend someone is in need of rescue or pity someone is of course to assert a higher status over the person who is pitied/to be rescued. It is always easier for someone defeated in argument to say "I pity you [for holding the views you do and taking the position you have because your rational arguments are indicative of a person lacking in irrationality, sentimentality and a desire to make futile gestures as a display of compassion/femininity/effeminacy]" than try to win the argument using truth, logic and morality.

Wednesday, 17 May 2017

Millennial Woes suggests Cleon Peterson is preparing white people for something unpleasant and inevitable

After a period of extreme degeneracy with extreme degenerate art to taunt the people, there will be a reaction. The Weimar Republic and Iran under the Shah come to mind.  Even as the matriarchy thinks it is fighting for its survival, its actions suggests a death wish and a siren call it is unwilling or unable to resist. Nietzsche said much the same thing in his time.  





http://www.europeancivilwar.com/paris-hosts-eiffel-tower-mural-explicitly-celebrating-the-genocide-of-white-people/




http://www.europeancivilwar.com/paris-hosts-eiffel-tower-mural-explicitly-celebrating-the-genocide-of-white-people/

Brendan O'Neill may talk big on free speech, but he has blocked me on Facebook and won't discuss slut-shaming



Al the speakers are good, including Brendan O'Neill.

He says at the end:

If  you feel you are being treated like a heretic, then you should behave like a heretic. You should pull your socks up and get your guns out.

This was exactly what I did, and guess what? Brendan O'Neill blocked me on Facebook. Does that mean he is a coward and a hypocrite?

I don't think he wants to discuss slut-shaming either.

Dr Augusto Zimmermann: cometh the hour, cometh the man on Sunday 11 June 2017 in Gold Coast?

13 themes constituting the main body of Political Correctness by Thilo Sarrazin


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thilo_Sarrazin

From 25:26 he speaks.

From 34:34 he lists his 13 Points.

  1. Inequality is bad, equality is good. 
  2. The secondary virtues like industriousness, punctuality have no particular value. Competition is morally objectionable except in sports because it promotes inequality. 
  3. The rich should feel guilty except those who have earned their money as athletes or pop stars.
  4. Different conditions of life has nothing to do with people's choices, but with the circumstances they are in. 
  5. All cultures are of equal rank and value, especially the ways and values of the Christian Occidental West. Western industrialised countries should not enjoy precedence. Those who think differently are provincial and xenophobic. 
  6. Islam is a religion of peace. Those who see any problems with immigration from Islamic countries are guilty of Islamophobia. This is is nearly as bad as antisemitism. 
  7. Western industrialised nations carry the main responsibility for poverty and backwardness and other problems in other parties of the world. 
  8. Men and women have no natural differences except for the physical signs of their sex. 
  9. Human abilities depend mainly on obtaining an education. Inherited differences play hardly any role. 
  10. There are no differences between people and races, except for the physical appearance. 
  11. A nation-state is an outdated model. National identity and peculiarities have no particular value. The national element as such is rather bad. It is at any rate not worth preserving.
  12. All people in the world do not only have equal rights, they are in fact equal. They should all be eligible for the benefits of the German welfare state. 
  13. Children are an entirely private affair. Immigration takes care of the labour market and of any other demographic problems.


Professor James Allan to speak at Gold Coast in a men's issues conference in Gold Coast 11 June 2017?

 

I just have a feeling that Dr Augusto Zimmermann who is scheduled to speak will be so intimated by threats to his person and career that he will find an excuse not to turn up. If my prediction is correct, who should replace him? http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/dr-augusto-zimmermann-cometh-hour.html 

I think it should be Professor James Allan who has not already been invited. He is based in at the University of Queenland in Brisbane only an hour away by car, so this omission is a puzzle to me.

 

The first speaker, Professor James Allan, should perhaps consider a job as a stand up comedian in men's clubs. Do listen to and enjoy his hugely enjoyable jokes, especially the one about sacrificing virgins! Will Australian men be allowed their freedom of association to exclude women and allowed their men's clubs? Probably not, because I hear they are completely cucked now.  







Dr Augusto Zimmermann: cometh the hour, cometh the man on Sunday 11 June 2017 in Gold Coast?



Dr Augusto Zimmerman, an academic lawyer, will be speaking on feminism at https://icmi.info/conference-information/conference-program on 11 June in Gold Coast, Australia.

The biggest men's issue of all in the Western world:


The topic he he will be speaking is TBA at the moment of writing, but I have just sent him an email with a suggestion.

Sent: Wednesday, 17 May 2017, 13:06
Subject: Your talk on Sunday June 11 2017

Dear Dr Zimmerman

I understand you will be speaking on the subject of feminism at an event that another lawyer Ken Arenson who wrote http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/WAJurist/2014/8.html will also be speaking.

I myself will neither be speaking nor attending because I am considered persona no granta by the men's right's movements.

If I were allowed to attend and speak, I would be making the point that if the problem is feminism and therefore matriarchy, then patriarchy must be the solution.

If patriarchy is the solution and patriarchy to be re-established, then the rules of marriage must be reimposed.

The rules of marriage are the prohibition and punishment of extramarital sex as well as the abolition of no fault divorce.

Patriarchy runs on marriage the way cars run on petrol.

Everything about feminism undermines marriage, because the stated aims of feminism are to undermine patriarchy.

Feminism operates by bribing me with premarital sex to distract them from marriage, and also to make marriage repugnant, difficult and unrewarding to them.

Even in a patriarchy, marriage is the most expensive form of sex.

Once men become accustomed to free love and sexual liberation, their morals will be corrupted. Marriage is after all an onerous undertaking , but most men, being primarily motivated by sex, will do anything for sex, including marry.

Feminism takes away that incentive.

Slut shaming is therefore anathema to feminism and it will not be long before feminists propose to criminalise such proposals as hate speech.

Slut shaming would indeed cut the legs off feminism.

But how would we get the poor specimens of manhood that Mike Buchanan and Paul Elam represent to support marriage when they already know they and their ilk and pitifully unmarriageable?

They cannot and will not.

But what male with alpha male qualities would sacrifice his status and access to sex to help these pitiable specimens of manhood?

They would not.

And so this is how Western civilisation will accelerate in its decline and degeneracy.

The only reliable source of social conservatism in the West is the Koran, because Christianity is know kaput and no longer fit for the purposes of maintaining morality.

Verses 4:15, 4:16 and 24:2 of the Koran would treat extramarital sex as a sexual offence.

The fact that Muslims treat marriage as a contract will implicitly and explicitly imply fault in divorce since divorce is only permissible if a term of the marriage contract has been breached.

Islam is hateful to the West, however.

But Western Man, should he acknowledge the grievous errors of the Sex Revolution and feminism, could rise again by striving for a one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism, which is a legal system and not a belief system.

http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/secular-koranism.html

I hope you will forward this to Ken Arenson and Greg Canning http://www.menshealthaustralia.net/content/doctor-greg-canning-quits-james-cook-university-teaching-pos.html if you have their email.

Regards

Claire Khaw

Men against feminism should tell women against feminism their views don't and won't matter because they can defeat the matriarchy without their support

What anti-feminist Erin Pizzey said about anti-feminist Claire Khaw. What will Iben Thranholm say?

There are only two kinds of morality because there are only two sexes

Why men will never get back their country again as long as democratic politicians keep chasing the female vote

Claire Khaw's Class and Gender Theory of Western Decline


26:35:

Thomas Jefferson famously once said the price of liberty is eternal vigilance. In the Western world these past few decades you would be hard pressed to describe the overriding attitude to freedom using the adjective vigilance.

David Hume once said: "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once. You lose it in all steps when well-meaning people reckon it is just not worth the effort to bother to defend something."

Cabinet ministers put their careers and chauffeur-driven cars and perhaps a core belief that they are so important that they can do more good by staying in cabinet and MPs more worried about the immigrant vote than with upholding the immigrant vote than upholding a core Western value. 

Hume's point is that once a one piece of freedom is taken away, the next piece of freedom becomes easier still. 

We came really close to that over Julia Gillard's proposed media laws. 

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/opinion/how-julia-gillard-was-ready-to-censor-our-free-media/news-story/c95cb7bb5280d56e9ed63698179f7a15

Tuesday, 16 May 2017

Evening gala of Belt and Road forum


Phoned home on Sunday. Neither my father nor my aunt would speak to me because they were watching this.

Not even mentioned at all in Western media, was it?

Monday, 15 May 2017

Men against feminism should tell women against feminism their views don't and won't matter because they can defeat the matriarchy without their support



She is right in what she says, but wouldn't it be more effective for anti-feminist men to say they didn't want our help at all?

I have no quarrel with anything she says, but just find her pink and pretty persona irritating because I know nothing much is going to happen if women just carry on doing their pink and pretty things.

Men need to tell women to butt the hell out of anti-feminism, that they don't need them and they can take care of themselves.

That's what I'd do if I were leading men against feminism. These beta males are too scared even to say the word feminism and beat about the bush calling it "men's issues". I, as a hypothetical alpha male would call my exclusively male band of merry men MAM (Men Against Matriarchy) - irony and pun absolutely intended. 

Or, they can tell women they can join, but have no voting rights and can never stand for leadership.
That would be the way to get the attention of the voting public.

Blonde in the Belly of the Beast praises Black Pigeon Speaks:





But I think Howard Dare makes the same point much better and more scarily. He also speaks to us directly, which I like, instead of reading from his essay on political theory.  





Beta male victims of feminism prefer to display their antisemitism and Islamophobia instead of discussing my solutions to feminism

The latest anti-Semitic cry: ban circumcision











http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/04/26/trump-now-captive-deep-state/