Wednesday, 18 October 2017

How Jews, Christians and Muslims should deal with the challenges of secularism

What are the limits of Jewish responsibility?

“What are the limits of Jewish Responsibility?”
A week-long conference hosted by Beth Torah
October 22-28
Featuring a kickoff event with Rabbi Sacks

Claire Khaw You owe the gentile the duty God felt Jonah owed the people of Nineveh.

If you live amongst them, you won't want them to be driven crazy by their out of control women and then take their anger out on you, do you?

You know the most virulent anti-Semites even blame you for Christianity (and its failure) and of course their current fear of having Christianity replaced by Islam.

Israel is not big enough to accommodate all of you and most of you I am sure would prefer to stay exactly where you are.

Out of your own self interest you should strive to prevent the descent of the gentile into ever deepening insanity and degeneracy. His current preoccupation with mentally ill adults and children who want to change their sex is a sign of his deepening dementia.

It would help if this was done with a real sense of focus and intent, not merely going through the motions for form's sake saying "We tried telling them, but they wouldn't listen. What can you do? Oy vey!" If you say it too politely, he won't understand. If you say it with just enough clarity and brutality to get the message through, he will get angry. Tough call.

I have tried, but no one listens to me. (It is probably because corrupt Western media have conspired to make a point of ignoring me altogether no matter how newsworthy I am, because I am not really supposed to exist.)

In Britain, Keith Joseph and Maurice Glasman have tried to help and warn the gentile, but had their careers destroyed by gentile women who are feminazis infesting every arm of government and every layer of state.

Rabbi Sacks has said himself that Jews don't listen to each other, especially as their religion does not have the equivalent of a Pope. I have noticed that gentiles never listen to each other either because of their accursed and erroneous doctrine of egalitarianism leading to feminism which also leads to constant buck-passing and avoidance of responsibility.

Happily, Rabbi Sacks has said himself that gentiles do listen to Jews and certainly did in the case of Jonah, and this cannot be denied: the people of Nineveh listened to Jonah, and Christians listened to Christ.

Cometh the hour, cometh the man.

Is Rabbi Sacks the man?

Greg Johnson:

I do believe that Jews are not just different from whites, but powerful and malevolent enemies who bear significant responsibility for causing white decline and opposing white renewal.

Most of the people who most hate Jews come from the lower strata of society, although of course there are exceptions. There will always be people who prefer to find convenient scapegoats rather than grasp the nettle of feminism or slay sacred cows or anything that might be unpopular.

Nationalists are unlikely to tackle feminism on their own because they are plebeian men who want to have sex with fornicatresses least likely to be able to afford a wife or found marriageable. Even if they knew for a fact that what I have said about feminism to be absolutely true, there will always be a temptation for those who do not have a strict regard for truth to insist that Jews are to blame rather than give up their sexual access to some fornicatress by offending them. Challenging feminism would of course be extremely offensive to most women who are overwhelmingly feminist.

It is well know that the lower classes if brought up at all do not have a strict regard for truth. Indeed, it can be said that even those who went to the best schools do not have a strict regard for truth. It is even possible that many Jews do not have a strict regard for truth.

"With privilege comes responsibility, and privileges can be withdrawn," I remember my headmistress Miss Howe saying.

How to nudge Jews in the direction of Secular Koranism

Nationalist men will always be keener to blame Jews and Muslims than their own treacherous women in positions of influence who don't care about them

Jews fret over gentiles suffering family breakdown caused by rampant rampaging feminism

Rabbi Sacks challenges Liberal Jews on their atheism

Simon Sheppard answers some daft questions on the British, God, Jews, antisemitism, Christianity, feminism and his childhood

Conservatism comes from theocracy

My Rosh Hashanah message to Jews who believe in patriarchy and see the evil of matriarchy

How Western men are demoralised in the workplace and how Western labour is made uncompetitive

Jews are blamed for everything, including the failure of Christianity

In our matriarchy, the Jew is lower in status to the fornicating slut, because even the privileged Jew dares not criticise her

Blame feminism, not Jews

Who corrupted whose morals?

Tuesday, 17 October 2017

Who corrupted whose morals?

A question occurs to me: has the West corrupted the morals of the Jew? Or has the Jew corrupted the morals of the gentile?

I suspect this question will be unanswerable, since neither will want to take the blame for corrupting each other's morals.

The Jew will say "But of course your laws corrupted our morals because we are only a minority in the land of the gentile."

The gentile will say "Of course you corrupted us, because many of you are in senior positions in politics, academia, the professions as well as banking. Your numbers may be few but your influence great indeed, being God's Chosen People who are so clever and cunning."

Understandably, atheist sexually liberated gentiles will have their morals easily corrupted by bad Jews, and bad Jews are unobservant assimilated and sexually liberated Jews.

Another unanswerable question is whether it was Eve who was to blame for leading Adam astray, or Adam for being so weak-willed as to be so easily led astray.

I think the answer must be that God was tired of Adam and Eve getting under His feet, raiding His fridge, smoking His stash, playing loud music and was just looking for an excuse to kick them out of Eden. He therefore used reverse psychology to give them the rope He knew they would take to hang themselves, so to speak.

I like to think that once the West has its one party theocracy governed by the principles of Secular Koranism as I hope will happen one day, Jews will be better Jews, Christians better Christians, Muslims better Muslims and even atheists relatively well-behaved. It is only through practising moral restraint that men can keep their women relatively under control, re-establish the patriarchy and regenerate a degenerate civilisation.

How social conservatives should deal with Liberal Jews in positions of influence in the West

The solution is to state the problem of liberalism and discredit liberals and liberalism which would include Liberal Jews.

It is easily demonstrated that liberalism caused feminism and feminism causes degeneracy. Degeneracy would adversely affect Jews living in the West too, causing them to give up the high-maintenance observance that is obviously beyond the degenerate to even understand, let alone practise. It would therefore be for the good of both Jews and gentiles that a government governing in the long term national interest kicks out feminism. Men both Jewish and gentile should cooperate to kick out feminism even if in the short to medium term they risk withdrawal of sexual access and even divorce under the insane rules of no fault divorce.

Any social conservative debating with a Liberal Jew should draw his attention to this truly magnificent denunciation of Liberal Jews by Melanie Phillips.

Dov Fischer, an adjunct professor of law and American orthodox rabbi:

We are socially conservative and economically capitalist because we take the Torah laws seriously. We give charity without the Government teaching us about morality because we are commanded to give. Contrary to stereotypes, we are brutally honest in business at great personal economic loss. We set aside a tenth of our earnings for charity. Our marriages are heterosexual. And several of us Orthodox rabbis even file amicus curiae briefs in the United States Supreme Court supporting religious positions taken by groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor.

It is so painful today for contemporary American Orthodox Jews to read daily media reports that typically ignore us, in an attempt to paint almost all Jews as liberal… Our organizations never get quoted. Our public affairs policy positions never get reported. Thus, for example, when an agglomeration of the most liberal left rabbis — the non-Orthodox rabbis — announce that they will not participate in a phone call with the President of the United States, the media splash the news. But why is “Dog Bites Man” news? These are the same Democrat liberal rabbis who fell over themselves to hail Obama, even as Obama allowed the United Nations to proclaim that Jews have no historical bond to any part of Jerusalem, even as Obama brushed off an anti-Jewish Radical Islamist terror attack at a kosher grocery in France as a case of “random violence,” even as Obama proceeded with the Iran deal. The bigger news story that the media fail to report is that the 1,000 members of the Orthodox Rabbinical Council of America did not join in the boycott announcement. Nor did the Agudath Israel of America. Nor did the rabbinical body of the 140-synagogue National Council of Young Israel. Nor did the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations of America, comprised of some 1,000 affiliated synagogues. Nor did the 200-plus rabbis of the Coalition for Jewish Values. The media blacked out the news that the majority of all seminary-ordained rabbis in the United States are Orthodox and that they gladly would participate in a phone call with the President of the United States.

In the same way, several Jewish organizations that historically were associated with protecting Jewish rights in the past have been taken over by the Democrats, converting them into de facto arms of the Left. The Anti-Defamation League, for example, now is run by a former Obama staffer, and he has turned ADL into a virtual Democrat mouthpiece. Similarly, an organization bearing the name of the precious youthful innocent Holocaust victim and heroine, Anne Frank, now is run by a former New Jersey Gay Marriage activist, an extreme leftist, and he now leverages the Anne Frank name to attack conservatives and Republicans, and runs around to media all-too-willing to give him a megaphone, calling exceptional conservative allies of the Jewish community and of Israel “anti-Semites.” 

What makes Jews hateful to the gentile is the perception that gentiles in their own land cannot mock or criticise the Jew because of Holocaust denial laws. The rule of law is so weak countries that allow Holocaust denial unofficially treat Holocaust denial as if it were a crime. It would be nice if there was at least one Jewish lawyer in Britain prepared to stand up for the rule of law as Alan Dershowitz does. Is that really too much to hope for?

My hope is that one day these ancestral hatreds of Jew and gentile will cease and Alison be given a part in Fiddler on the Roof. I can  just see Alison playing Golde, can't you?

Even Jews themselves have got into trouble over Holocaust denial laws the most prominent of which is the Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu himself.

Natanyahu said. “Hitler didn’t want to exterminate the Jews at the time, but only to expel them.

Another prominent Jew who got into trouble over Holocaust denial is Rabbi Mizrachi.

Mizrachi suggested the behavior of non-religious Jews as a cause for Nazi atrocities and warned that slack observance could bring about “further tragedy.”

Catholic Church a haunt for gay men since the 1940s, according to Michael Voris.

The problem has always been with Assimilated Jews and a corruptible and corrupt priesthood ie people who ignore and then forget the founding principles of their religion/ideology in the heedless pursuit of short-term expediency.

There is something rotten in the state of Denmark. 

Those who think the Third Temple should be built clearly have not learned from history. Let us hope they will not be condemned to learn its harsh lessons again.  The Al-Aqsa Mosque is therefore fine where it is.

The Liberal Jew can be equated with the elitist Sadducees so eager to collaborate with their Roman overlords and be Hellenised. Such a Jew would be sexually liberated and indifferent to the pain caused by neoliberal and neoconservative policies that cause social problems and provoke terrorism.

The Conservative Jew is analogous to the married taxpaying father trying to do his to do his best by his children and family while staying faithful to his traditions without which he knows he could not even be said to have traditions to be faithful to. Such a Jew would be inclined to and does in fact vote for anti-immigration parties even as he knows a significant number of its supporters are in fact anti-Semites.

Monday, 16 October 2017

Is feminism dangerous to your liberty?

Feminism is dangerous to your liberty if it is indeed true that feminism causes

false rape accusations to be successfully prosecuted in courts where a defendant is no longer treated as innocent till proven guilty after a fair trial

in a country where the Director of Public Prosecutions is female,

where the Chairman of the Bar Council is female,

where the Home Secretary is female,

where the Prime Minister is also female

and where most female MPs are for gay marriage and against leaving the EU.

The more promiscuous the women, the more shameless the women. The more shameless the women, the more likely they are to report rape.

The more promiscuous the women, the stupider they are. The stupider they are, the more likely they will be pumped and dumped.

The more women are pumped and dumped, the more likely they will be angry and bitter about being pumped and dumped.

The more angry and bitter women are about a lifetime of being pumped and dumped, the more likely they are to falsely accuse a man of rape, especially if a successful conviction entitles them to £11,000.

Is feminism even more totalitarian than a theocracy that guarantees the freedom of belief the way Islam does at

Is it not the case that all anti-discrimination legislation is in fact thoughtcrime passed by feminists and their running dogs?  

In the UK the Equality Act 2010 contains most of the thoughtcrime passed by our matriarchy which is clearly unIslamic under 2:256 of the Koran.

It is quite a thought, is it not, to discover that Islam actually gives taxpayers more liberty than feminism? 

Is patriarchy less restrictive on your liberty than feminism because it gives you the constitutional right not to be taxed more than a flat rate tax of 20%?

Is it fair enough that those who do not pay taxes do not vote?

Is it not fair enough that the low-waged should not be subject to the burden of being taxed nor the burden of voting?

Would not a patriarchy - a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers - be more lightly governed than a matriarchy - a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers with illegitimate offspring whom they badly parent?

Is it not abundantly clear that patriarchy is what all rational and moral citizens both men and women should choose while booting out our degenerate matriarchy that was built on decades of feminist legislation which could be repealed at the stroke of the pen?

Has feminism turned our male MPs into spineless worms afraid of their own shadow, terrified of being divorced under the rules of no fault divorce by their entitled wives, accused of a historic sexual offence or deprived of their matrimonial home and children in the family court whose judges are mostly female?

Saturday, 14 October 2017

Rabbi Sacks discussing female moral development with two Jewesses one of whom is a feminist

Rabbi Sacks is notably uxorious and for a very good reason. I have had men told me that but for their wife's approval, an onerous undertaking - usually political activism - would never have been attempted. I invite him to consider if the late Lawrence Kohlberg, whose work the feminazis are so obviously trying to delegitimise, marginalise and suppress, has been the victim of two women whom he felt he had a right to trust.

Jewish women will not care about what happens to Jewish men as they insist on greater quantities of their toxic feminism.

Is now time to consider why Jews acknowledged the prophethood of Balaam.

I invite Jews to consider if there is a single feminist now living who does not condone fornication.

If the answer is an obvious NO, then I invite Jews to consider the operation of feminism and how both its legs would be cut off the moment sluts are shamed again. Fornication is the bribe feminism offers to atheist men that they cannot any longer refuse.

God was invented to protect his civilisation from the immoral women that will destroy it.

In important matters of morality, there should be no disagreement between men and women of reason and who care about the health and the long term survival of their civilisation.

The Messianic Welcoming Committee I hope I have persuaded the Jews to organise

Should I be acknowledged by the Jews as their Mashiach, Secular Koranism - sharia interpreted by yours truly - would really take off. I therefore urge British Jewry to consider the benefits of having a British Mashiach and how pleased and proud the British gentile would be with British Jewry if they accepted me as their Mashiach. This would  allow them to acknowledge the open-mindedness, diversity, tolerance and benevolence of Judaism when these days they tend to dwell darkly on being the victims of Jewish conspiracies that they are always harping on about.

The real reason for Kol Nidre

To: Rabbi Sacks
Sent: Sunday, 24 September 2017, 21:30:07 GMT+1
Subject: The real reason for Kol Nidre

The vows annulled at Kol Nidre do not include vows made to people and this includes gentiles, only to God. In other words, the purpose of Kol Nidre is not a licence to not keep promises to people, but is intended to make the promisor think which vows to God he will renew after Kol Nidre and which he will allow to expire, if they are found to be foolish or redundant. This is an excellent idea giving us a chance to perform an annual review of promises made to God and decide on their necessity, folly or redundancy, which can only increase our wisdom and self-knowledge.

May I know what Rabbi Sacks thinks of this suggestion, which I do not believe was mentioned at

Friday, 13 October 2017

How to nudge Jews in the direction of Secular Koranism

Jews can be divided into Observant Conservative Jews and Assimilated Feminist/Liberal Sabbath-breaking unobservant Jews.

Liberal Jews are not even supposed to exist and for this reason Conservative Jews should dissociate themselves from Liberal Jews. According to Mosaic Law, to desecrate shabbat intentionally, despite warning, is a capital offense.

Liberal Jews are of course feminist Jews and feminist Jews are Amalekites which observant Jews are obliged to exterminate.

This is because the Amalekites are matriarchal and believed to have been the Neanderthals who did not practice marriage. This meant that they were exterminated by homo sapiens who did practice marriage and who were therefore patriarchal.

It can easily be seen that patriarchies easily and inevitably exterminate matriarchies because patriarchies are more efficiently and rationally organised.

Obviously, a society that prioritises the preferences of married fathers would be more moral, rational, better governed in the long term national interest and fairer than a society that prioritises the preferences of unmarried mothers and their illegitimate offspring.

The Amalekites are of course people who don't observe the Noahide laws. Jews have a religious duty to exterminate Amalekites and Jews who deny they have this duty would understandably be suspected of being Amalekites themselves or of being their agents of subversion. Deut. 25:19

It cannot be denied that the very basis of Western civilisation has been subverted by feminism, can it?

While Islam imposes a duty of jihad on Muslims, there is nothing in the Koran that says anything as nasty as exterminating any group as a religious duty.

The best way to put it to these Liberal/Feminist Jews is that if they support Secular Koranism, they will no longer be considered Amalekites.

Since Secular Koranism guarantees freedom of belief with 2:256, they can still call themselves Liberal and Reform Jews and worship in any way they please, provided they say they support Secular Koranism and promise not to break the laws of a state governed by the principles of Secular Koranism.

That's the JQ sorted. Easy peasy lemon squeezy!

Thursday, 12 October 2017

My father would completely agree with Reactionary Expat about the Taiwanese

Reactionary Expat mentions the Chinese attitude towards the JQ which is a mixture of admiration and revulsion, apparently.

The important thing to note is that Taiwan is post-industrial and suffering from the same problem of bad parenting, materialism caused by the Worship of Mammon. In Taiwan, they cannot blame Jews, only their rotten culture of materialism and democracy.

The Chinese keep a ledger of cash gifts received and given to each other and there will be expectations of attendance and reciprocity.

The Strawberry Generation is called this because they bruise easily because they have been wrapped in cotton wool and spoilt by their parents.

Alan Dershowitz denounces Hard Left Intersectionality and discusses Israel and US foreign policy

Alan Dershowitz denounces intersectionality.

He does not appear to have made the connection between feminism and intersectionality.

Intersectionality is of course the measurement and acquisition of victimhood as a means of showing status.

I am afraid Dershowitz is a Liberal Jew who has allowed himself his Liberalism to trump his Judaism.

He says he is a Democrat, and "I buy the entire liberal agenda up and down and I am a Zionist."

I am a feminist and I am a Zionist, I am a gay rights activist and I am a Zionist, and I will never give up the Democratic Party.