Pattern of discussion on MSM: 1) Neocon sets the agenda. 2) Bleeding heart pro-migrant non-white women back him up. Just FUCK OFF. #bbctbq— Claire Khaw (@ntfem) May 7, 2017
If they can't get non-white women, they will get white women, especially white BBC female journalists like the ones at http://thevoiceofreason-ann.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/female-journalists-pro-migrant-coverage.html, to whinge for more migrants and refugees to come to the West, but it is better if they use non-white women because these women are supposed to represent the nations and races who are the victims of neocon bombing and it is more convincing coming from them.
The best combo is a non-white woman with a cute baby or child tugging at the heart strings of clueless white female voters who feel obliged to display compassion by nagging or threatening white men eg SJWs and white male politicians into taking steps to do so.
Wake up and wise up, nationalists of both sexes.
Don't let these fuckers get away with it any more.
The Big Question on today’s show is: Has Humanitarianism done more harm than good? #bbctbq— The Big Questions (@bbcbigquestions) May 7, 2017
.@alanmendoza : Well you can’t drop democracy from the sky I don’t think anyone on this panel would suggest you can #bbctbq— The Big Questions (@bbcbigquestions) May 7, 2017
.@alanmendoza : he was developing weapons of mass destruction, that was the justification#bbctbq— The Big Questions (@bbcbigquestions) May 7, 2017
. @thephilippics: The WMD were very quickly debunked and they quickly move to a humanitarian rational to go into Iraq #bbctbq— The Big Questions (@bbcbigquestions) May 7, 2017
.@o_rutazibwa: There are moment when we shouldn’t even have a debate just go and save the people if we have to.— The Big Questions (@bbcbigquestions) May 7, 2017
Have you noticed that the British national interest is never ever discussed?
Why the fuck are we bombing Syria?
Because the neoconning Americans and the "defence" industry want us to and our shit for brains politicians haven't the courage or intelligence to resist them.
Why do we pretend to be surprised that Syrian refugees prefer to go to Europe than head towards Africa when they are fleeing their ravaged country?
Before that question is even asked, the discussion turns towards the plight of the refugees and the sheeple are emotionally bullied into discussing it at great length and then getting precisely nowhere.
The only thing that we are never allowed to discuss is the British national interest and why our MPs always vote for war invasion, bombing and no-fly zones. They must be in the pay of the US neocons and the defence industries, mustn't they?
Or they have shit for brains and vote however their party leader tells them to.
Fuck this shitty system called liberal democracy. Let's just have a one party theocracy instead.
BAD FOREIGN POLICY: the two ruinous world wars Britain fought before losing its empire and becoming a US and EU vassal state
The Collapse Is Closer Than Ever